Peer Review reports
From: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in nonagenarians: is it worthwhile?
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sep 2020 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 14 Oct 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Neal Fleming |
| 22 Oct 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pietro Scicchitano |
| 24 Oct 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 28 Oct 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Mohammed Meah |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 28 Oct 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 1 Nov 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pietro Scicchitano |
| 3 Nov 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Neal Fleming |
| 22 Nov 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 29 Nov 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Mohammed Meah |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 29 Nov 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 20 Dec 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Mohammed Meah |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 20 Dec 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Dec 2020 | Editorially accepted | |
| 13 Jan 2021 | Article published | 10.1186/s12872-020-01833-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.