Skip to main content

Table 2 Odds ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) between intervention vs control during active and post intervention period

From: Thrombolysis implementation intervention and clinical outcome: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial

 

Active Intervention Period

Post Intervention Period

Number, n (%)

OR (95% CI)

p-value

Number, n (%)

OR (95% CI)

p-value

Excellent Outcome (Three month post treatment mRS 0–2)

 Control

74 (39%)

Reference

Reference

57 (36%)

Reference

Reference

 Intervention

106 (45%)

1.57 (0.73–3.39)

0.250

72 (44%)

1.33 (0.73–2.44)

0.357

Poor Outcome (Three month post treatment mRS 5–6)

 Control

29 (15%)

Reference

Reference

22 (14%)

Reference

Reference

 Intervention

34 (14%)

0.96 (0.56–2.07)

0.817

24 (15%)

1.44 (0.61–3.41)

0.405

PH (Post treatment)

 Control

16 (6.2%)

Reference

Reference

12 (6%)

Reference

Reference

 Intervention

9 (3.2%)

0.53 (0.21–1.32)

0.173

10 (4.5%)

0.96 (0.36–2.52)

0.928

  1. Mixed effects logistic mixed model was used
  2. Models were controlled for baseline thrombolysis rate, pre-morbid modified Rankin Score (mRS) and baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
  3. A p-value < 0.05 was considered as significant