Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of antithrombotic therapy between the pre-campaign and campaign periods

From: Impact of care coordination on oral anticoagulant therapy among patients with atrial fibrillation in routine clinical practice in Japan: a prospective, observational study

 

Pre-campaign period

N = 86

Campaign period

N = 90

Antithrombotic therapy

60 (69.8)

70 (77.8)

 Oral anticoagulant agents

52 (60.5)

62 (68.9)

  Warfarin

11 (21.2)

11 (17.7)

  DOACs

41 (78.8)

51 (82.3)

 Antiplatelet agents

12 (14.0)

10 (11.1)

CHADS2 score low (score, 0)

N = 4

N = 6

 Oral anticoagulant agents

4 (100.0)

2 (33.3)

  Warfarin

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

  DOACs

4 (100.0)

2 (100.0)

CHADS2 score Intermediate (score, 1)

N = 13

N = 10

 Oral anticoagulant agents

7 (53.8)

9 (90.0)

  Warfarin

1 (14.3)

3 (33.3)

  DOACs

6 (85.7)

6 (66.7)

CHADS2 score high (score, ≥2)

N = 69

N = 74

 Oral anticoagulant agents

41 (59.4)

51 (68.9)

  Warfarin

10 (24.4)

8 (15.7)

  DOACs

31 (75.6)

43 (84.3)

OAC therapy based on JCS 2013 guidelines

48 (55.8)

64 (71.1)

  1. Data are n (%)
  2. Abbreviations: JCS 2013 Japanese guidelines for pharmacotherapy of atrial fibrillation, DOACs Direct oral anticoagulants