The impact of nontraditional lipid profiles on left ventricular geometric abnormalities in general Chinese population

Table 2 Linear regression models of relation of nontraditional lipid profiles to LV structural parameters

Variables	LVMI		LVEDVI		Concentricity		LVWT
	β	P value	β	P value	β	P value	β	P value
TC/HDL-C ratio
Model 1	0.070	< 0.001	0.089	< 0.001	0.041	< 0.001	0.092	< 0.001
Model 2	0.036	< 0.001	0.026	0.009	0.027	0.007	0.048	< 0.001
TG/HDL-C ratio
Model 1	0.057	< 0.001	0.073	< 0.001	0.036	< 0.001	0.091	< 0.001
Model 2	0.021	0.036	0.008	0.405	0.020	0.050	0.043	< 0.001
LDL-C/HDL-C ratio
Model 1	0.073	< 0.001	0.085	< 0.001	0.046	< 0.001	0.090	< 0.001
Model 2	0.037	< 0.001	0.018	0.071	0.031	0.003	0.043	< 0.001
Non-HDL-C
Model 1	0.071	< 0.001	0.076	< 0.001	0.047	< 0.001	0.086	< 0.001
Model 2	0.032	0.001	0.009	0.347	0.027	0.006	0.039	< 0.001

Models constructed with LV structural parameters as dependent variables and nontraditional lipid profiles as independent variables. β coefficient is per 1 SD increase of the nontraditional lipid profile. Abbreviations: TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Non-HDL-C non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LVMI left ventricular mass index, LVEDVI left ventricular end-diastolic volume index, LVWT left ventricular wall thickness. Model 1: unadjusted; Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, race, education level, family income, diet score, smoking and drinking status, physical activity, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, history of cardiovascular disease, antihypertensive medication use, and antidiabetic medication use

ISSN: 1471-2261