Skip to main content

Table 4 Studies of concomitant sildenafil and bosentan

From: Sildenafil dosed concomitantly with bosentan for adult pulmonary arterial hypertension in a randomized controlled trial

Study

Design

Additional PAH-specific therapy?

N

IPAH/HPAH

patients %

CTD patients, %

WHO or NYHA FC II/III/IV,

% of patients

Age, y, mean ± SD

Sildenafil dose

Key results

Vizza et al. (current study)

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Sildenafil or placebo added to bosentan therapy

No

103

65%

35%

34%/65%/1%

Median (range), 59 (19–83) y

20 mg TID

(bosentan 62.5 mg BID [n = 5] or 125 mg BID [n = 97]; 1 patient missing data)

No significant improvement in primary endpoint of 6MWD at week 12, nor secondary endpoints of Borg dyspnea score, clinical worsening,

WHO FC, BNP/proBNP

Extension study: 1-year survival of 96%; no notable improvement in 6MWD

Hoeper et al. [29]

Open label, uncontrolled study

Sildenafil added to bosentan

(treat to goal: 6MWD of 380 m; PVO2 of 10.4 ml/min/kg during CPET)

1 patient also received inhaled iloprost; 1 patient with a 2-y history of IV iloprost

9

100%

0%

0%/89%/11%

39 ± 9 y

25 mg TID, then 50 mg TID after 4–12 wk. if not reaching goal

(standard bosentan)

a3 patients improved FC at 3 mo after combination therapy; 2 others improved after 6–12 mo

a6MWD improved after 3 mo of combination therapy, remained stable throughout 6–12 mo follow-up

aPVO2 improved after 3 mo of combination therapy (n = 6 patients with CPET data)

Lunze et al. [30]

Open-label, uncontrolled study

Upfront combination or sildenafil added to bosentan

No

11

36%

0%

(CHD, 45%; CTEPH, 9%; radiogenic, 9%)

18%/82%/0%

Median (range), 12.9 (5.5–54.7)

Mean, 2.1±

0·9 mg/kg

(bosentan, 2.3 ± 0·6 mg/kg)

After median (range) follow-up of 1.1 (0.5–2.5) y,

a~1-FC (NYHA) improvement

aIncreased transcutaneous O2 saturation and PVO2 (n = 10)

aImproved 6MWD (n = 8)

aDecreased mPAP (n = 9), resting heart rate

Right ventricular systolic pressure

van Wolferen et al. [31]

Open-label, uncontrolled study

Sildenafil added to bosentan (which patients were receiving for prior 1 y) for 3 mo

NS

15

60%

20%

(HIV, 7%; CHD, 13%)

13%/87%/0%

45 ± 15

50 mg BID for 4 wk., 50 mg TID until 3 mo

(bosentan dose NS)

aDecreased NT-proBNP

aIncreased 6MWD

aImproved cardiac index, right ventricular ejection fraction, right ventricular mass, RVEDV:LVEDV ratio

No significant improvement: stroke volume index, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular mass, RVEDV, LVEDV

Mathai et al. [32]

Open-label, uncontrolled study

Sildenafil added to bosentan monotherapy in ‘failing’ patients

1/13 IPAH & 5/12 CTD patients required additional therapy during study (prostacyclins)

25

52% (included anorexigen-associated)

48% (all scleroderma-associated)

I/II = 20%

III/IV = 80%

IPAH, 60 ± 8

CTD, 52 ± 13

Pre-July 2005, 25 mg TID, increased to 50 mg TID after 2–3 wk.; increased to 100 mg TID if no improvement; after, 20 mg TID (patients already on higher dose continued that dose)

(bosentan)

1-class NYHA FC improvement in 7 of 25 pts. (IPAH, n = 5; CTD, n = 2)

a6MWD improvement in IPAH pts.

No 6MWD improvement in CTD pts.

(Note: average daily sildenafil dose higher in CTD [168 ± 82 mg/d] vs IPAH [98 ± 65 mg/d])

Porhownik et al. [33]

Open-label, uncontrolled study

Sildenafil added to bosentan in patients with inadequate improvement on monotherapy

No

10

80%

20%

50%/50%/0% (before combination therapy)

49.7 (range, 24–72)

NS

aMean 6MWD improved at 6 mo vs baseline value before combination therapy initiation

1-class FC improvement in 3 pts. at 3 mo after combination therapy, maintained at 6 mo

D’Alto et al. [34]

Open-label, uncontrolled study

Sildenafil added to patients with clinical deterioration on bosentan monotherapy

NS

32

0%

0%

(CHD, 100% [88% Eisen-menger])

NS

37.1 ± 13.7

20 mg TID

(bosentan, 94% 125 mg BID, 6% 62.5 mg BID [due to edema])

aImproved WHO FC, 6MWD, SpO2 post-exercise, Borg dyspnea index, NT-proBNP

No significant differences: resting SpO2, heart rate (resting or post-exercise), hematocrit, hemoglobin, red blood cell count, platelets, aspartate and alanine aminotransferases

Iversen et al. [35]

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study

Open-label bosentan for 9 mo, with sildenafil or placebo added at 3 mo and opposite treatment last 3 mo

No

21

0%

0%

(CHD, 100% [all Eisen-menger])

43%/48%/5%

42 (range, 22–68)

25 mg TID for 2 wk., then 50 mg TID for 10 wk. (or matching placebo)

(bosentan, 62.5 mg BID for 2 wk., then 125 mg BID)

Trend toward 6MWD improvement with combination therapy

aResting systemic O2 saturation

No significant changes in systolic or diastolic blood pressure; systemic O2 saturation during exercise; NT-proBNP; NYHA FC; pulmonary, systemic or pulmonary/systemic blood flow (assess with catheterization or MRI); pulmonary or systemic vascular resistance

(Note: only patients completing the trial [n = 19] included in analysis)

Galie et al. [36]

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of bosentan

Subset of patients receiving open-label sildenafil

No

28

61%

18%

(CHD, 17%; HIV, 4%; other, 1%)

NS

Bosentan group, 45.2 ± 17.9

Placebo group,

44.2 ± 16.5

NS

(bosentan;

unless <40 kg, then 62.5 mg BID)

aPVR improved vs baseline at 6 mo

No significant difference in 6MWD at 6 mo

Benza et al. [abstract] [10]

Open-label, uncontrolled study

Treat to goal (6MWD ≥380 m), bosentan for 16 wk.; continue monotherapy or add sildenafil for additional 12 wk

No (patients were treatment-naïve)

100

NS

NS

NS/NS/79%/NS

56

20 mg TID

(bosentan, 125 mg BID)

31% of patients reached 6MWD goal (bosentan, 16%; combination, 15%); mean improvement of 22 and 45 m vs baseline at wk. 16 and 28, respectively

23% of patients had ≥1-class FC improvement vs baseline at wk. 16; 34% at wk. 28 (n = 85)

McLaughlin et al. [24]

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Bosentan or placebo added to stable dose sildenafil (≥12 mo) until first morbidity/mortality event

NS

334

NS

NS

NS

NS

≥20 mg TID

(bosentan 125 mg BID)

No significant improvement in time to first morbidity/mortality event vs placebo (primary endpoint; 17% risk reduction vs placebo; P = 0.25)

Placebo-corrected improvement of 21.8 m in 6MWD at wk. 16; NT-proBNP level over 20 mo was 23.5% lower with bosentan vs placebo; no treatment difference for other endpoints

  1. 6MWD 6-min walk distance, APAH associated PAH, BID twice daily, BNP brain natriuretic peptide, CHD congenital heart defect, CPET cardiopulmonary exercise testing, CTD connective tissue disease, CTEPH chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, ETRA endothelin receptor antagonist, FC functional class, IPAH/HPAH idiopathic PAH/heritable PAH, IV intravenous, LVEDV left ventricular end diastolic volume, mPAP mean pulmonary arterial pressure, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, NS not stated, NT-proBNP N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, NYHA New York Heart Association, PAH pulmonary arterial hypertension, PDE5i phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, PVO 2 peak oxygen consumption, PVR pulmonary vascular resistance, RVEDV right ventricular end diastolic volume, SpO 2 transcutaneous oxygen saturation, TID three times daily, WHO World Health Organization
  2. aDenotes statistically significant improvement vs baseline (also vs bosentan monotherapy [Mathai])
  3. 62.5 mg BID for 4 weeks, 125 mg BID thereafter
  4. Value is for the overall study (n = 185); not reported for the n = 28 patient subset receiving combination therapy