Skip to main content

Table 4 Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of selected outcomes comparing new rivaroxaban users to new dabigatran users for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation, MarketScan, 2010–2014

From: Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin or dabigatran for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

 

Rivaroxaban User (n = 16,957)

Matched Dabigatran User (n = 16,957)

Hazard Ratio

(95% CI) a

p-value

Main outcomes

# Events

Person-years

IR (95% CI)

# Events

Person-years

IR (95% CI)

  

 Ischemic stroke

82

21,721

3.8 (3.0–4.7)

107

21,723

4.9 (4.1–5.9)

0.77 (0.58–1.03)

0.08

 Intracranial bleeding

26

21,787

1.2 (0.8–1.7)

17

21,774

0.8 (0.5–1.2)

1.47 (0.80–2.72)

0.22

 Myocardial infarction

140

21,734

6.4 (5.4–7.6)

124

21,703

5.7 (4.8–6.8)

1.11 (0.87–1.41)

0.42

 Gastrointestinal bleeding

255

21,633

11.8 (10.4–13.3)

198

21,641

9.1 (7.9–10.5)

1.28 (1.06–1.54)

0.01

Control outcomes

 Hip / pelvic fracture

101

21,770

4.6 (3.8–5.6)

116

21,706

5.3 (4.4–6.4)

0.88 (0.67–1.15)

0.34

 Breast / prostate cancer

140

21,726

6.4 (5.4–7.6)

130

21,719

6.0 (5.0–7.1)

1.06 (0.84–1.35)

0.61

 Asthma

245

21,645

11.3 (10.0–12.8)

203

21,629

9.4 (8.2–10.7)

1.18 (0.98–1.42)

0.09

  1. IR incidence rate, CI confidence interval
  2. Incidence rate is per 1000 person-years
  3. aAdjusted for age, sex, CHA2DS2-VASc score, prevalent outcome and high-dimensional propensity score