Skip to main content

Table 2 Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of selected outcomes comparing new rivaroxaban users to new warfarin users for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation, MarketScan, 2010–2014

From: Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin or dabigatran for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

 

Rivaroxaban User (n = 32,495)

Matched Warfarin User (n = 45,496)

Hazard Ratio

(95% CI)a

p-value

Main outcomes

# Events

Person-years

IR (95% CI)

# Events

Person-years

IR (95% CI)

  

 Ischemic stroke

165

33,252

5.0 (4.3–5.8)

347

45,965

7.5 (6.8–8.4)

0.75 (0.62, 0.91)

0.003

 Intracranial bleeding

46

33,309

1.4 (1.0–1.8)

124

45,958

2.7 (2.3–3.2)

0.55 (0.39, 0.78)

0.0008

 Myocardial infarction

244

33,183

7.4 (6.5–8.3)

421

45,965

9.2 (8.3–10.1)

0.88 (0.75, 1.03)

0.11

 Gastrointestinal bleeding

492

33,134

14.8 (13.6–16.2)

717

45,649

15.7 (14.6–16.9)

1.07 (0.95, 1.20)

0.29

Control outcomes

 Hip / pelvic fracture

194

33,214

5.8 (5.1–6.7)

408

45,866

8.9 (8.1–9.8)

0.83 (0.70, 0.99)

0.04

 Breast / prostate cancer

272

33,236

8.2 (7.3–9.2)

419

45,941

9.1 (8.3–10.0)

0.92 (0.79, 1.08)

0.33

 Asthma

443

33,157

13.4 (12.2–14.6)

606

45,769

13.2 (12.2–14.3)

0.99 (0.88, 1.13)

0.93

  1. IR incidence rate, CI confidence interval
  2. Incidence rate is per 1000 person-years
  3. aAdjusted for age, sex, CHA2DS2-VASc score, prevalent outcome and high-dimensional propensity score