Skip to main content

Table 6 Proportiona of children who met recommendations according to the NH&MRCb guidelines

From: Does the presence of cardiovascular disease risk factors or established disease influence the dietary intake of affected adults and their children residing in the same household? A secondary analysis of the Australian Health Survey (2011–2013)

Nutrient

Recommended intake (per day on average)

Proportion (95% CI) meeting recommendations

Test Statistics

Children living in households with known adults with CVD or CVD risk factors

(n = 1609)

Other children

(n = 1109)

Total fat

(AMDR)

20–35% of total energy intake

90.1% (84.9%–95.2%)

90.1% (85.1%–95.0%)

0.003

Sat fat +

Trans fat

A(AMDR)

≤10% of total energy intake

3.2% (0.9%–5.6%)

3.0% (0.6%–5.5%)

-0.11

ALA

(AI)

1–3 years 0.5 g

4–8 years 0.8 g

Boys

9–13 years 1 g

14–18 years 1.2 g

Girls

9–13 years 0.8 g

14–18 years 0.8 g

80.8% (74.2%–87.5%)

83.1% (76.2%–90.0%)

0.47

Total LC N3

(AI)

1–3 years 40 mg

4–8 years 55 mg

9–13 years 70 mg

Boys

14–18 years 125 mg

Girls

14–18 years 85 mg

89.2% (81.0%–97.5%)

93.4% (85.6%–100.0%)

0.72

Fibre

(AI)

1–3 years 14 g

4–8 years 18 g

Boys

9–13 years 24 g

14–18 years 28 g

Girls

9–13 years 20 g

14–18 years 22 g

40.8% (36.7%–44.9%)

43.6% (39.0%–48.1%)

0.88

Sodium

(UL)

1–3 1000 mg

4–8 years 1400 mg

9–13 years 2000 mg

14–18 years 2300 mg

17.5% (12.5%–22.5%)

17.2% (12.4%–22.0%)

−0.08

  1. a Proportion estimated from two 24-h dietary recalls and from food intake only, adjusted for sequence (from personal interview or telephone interview), day of week (weekdays, Mon to Fri; or weekend days, Sat and Sun), age groups (18; 19–30; 31–50; 51–70, or >70 years), gender, SEIFA quintiles (where 1st quintile was the lowest 20% and 5th quintile was the highest 20%), smoking status (current smoker, ex-smoker, never smoked)
  2. b Recommendation according the NH&MRC, Optimising diets for lowering chronic disease risk (AMDR – Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range for total fat, saturated plus trans fat); adequate intake (AI) for total long chain omega 3 fatty acids (LCN3) and fibre; upper level of intake (UL) for sodium
  3. c All test statistics were either > − 1.96 or <1.96, therefore none of the differences between the two groups were considered significant at the α = 0.05 level