Table 3 Dual access group had a higher success rate than the unidirectional technique group
Locations of lesion | Group 1 | Group 2 | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
RIV | (1/1) 100.00% | (2/2) 100.00% | - |
RSCV | (0/0) 0.00% | (2/2) 100.00% | - |
SVC | (1/1) 100.00% | (3/3) 100.00% | - |
IJV+ SVC | (1/1) 100.00% | (0/1) 0.00% | - |
RIV + SVC | (0/2) 0.00% | (3/4) 75.00% | 0.350 |
RSCV + RIV | (0/2) 0.00% | (2/3) 66.67% | 0.361 |
RSCV + RIV + SVC | (1/2) 50.00% | (2/3) 66.67% | 0.709 |
LIV | (1/2) 50.00% | (2/2) 100.00% | 0.171 |
LSCV | (1/1) 100.00% | (2/2) 100.00% | - |
LIV + SVC | (1/2) 50.00% | (3/3) 100.00% | 0.171 |
LSCV + LIV | (2/3) 66.67% | (2/3) 66.67% | - |
LSCV + LIV + SVC | (0/1) 0.00% | (1/2) 50.00% | - |
Total | (9/19) 47.36% | (25/30) 83.33% | 0.012 |