Skip to main content

Table 4 Predictive discrimination of four models at different cut off values of cardiovascular risk thresholds over 2.5-year of follow-up

From: Short-term predictive ability of selected cardiovascular risk prediction models in a rural Bangladeshi population: a case-cohort study

Cut-off values

5 %

10 %

20 %

30 %

Women

 Sensitivity (95 % CI)

    
 

Model 1

87.1 (70.2–96.4)

71.0 (52.0–85.8)

54.8 (36.0–72.7)

41.9 (24.5–60.9)

 

Model 2

90.3 (74.2–98.0)

67.7 (48.6–83.3)

48.4 (30.2–66.9)

35.5 (19.2–54.6)

 

Model 3

87.1 (70.2–96.4)

71.0 (52.0–85.8)

45.2 (27.3–64.0)

29.0 (14.2–48.0)

 

Model 4

83.9 (66.3–94.5)

77.4 (58.9–90.4)

54.8 (36.0–72.7)

38.7 (21.8–57.8)

 Specificity (95 % CI)

 

Model 1

24.7 (17.9–32.5)

40.4 (32.4–48.8)

57.5 (49.1–65.7)

69.9 (61.7–77.2)

 

Model 2

24.8 (17.3–31.7)

42.5 (34.3–50.9)

53.4 (45.0–61.7)

67.1 (58.9–74.7)

 

Model 3

28.1 (21.0–36.1)

38.4 (30.4–46.8)

53.4 (45.0–61.7)

65.8 (57.5–73.4)

 

Model 4

29.5 (22.2–37.6)

43.2 (35.0–51.6)

61.0 (52.5–68.9)

70.5 (62.5–77.8)

 Positive predictive value (95 % CI)

 

Model 1

19.7 (13.4–27.4)

20.2 (13.1–28.9)

21.5 (13.1–32.2)

22.8 (12.7–35.8)

 

Model 2

20.1 (13.8–27.8)

20.2 (12.8–28.9)

18.1 (10.5–28.0)

18.6 (9.7–30.9)

 

Model 3

20.5 (13.9–28.3)

19.6 (12.7–28.2)

17.1 (9.7–27.0)

15.3 (7.2–27.0)

 

Model 4

20.2 (13.6–28.1)

22.4 (14.9–31.5)

23.0 (14.0–34.2)

21.8 (11.8–35.0)

 Negative predictive value (95 % CI)

 

Model 1

90.0 (76.3–97.2)

86.8 (76.4–93.8)

85.7 (77.2–92.0)

85.0 (77.3–90.9)

 

Model 2

92.1 (78.6–98.3)

86.1 (75.9–93.1)

83.0 (73.8–89.9)

83.1 (75.0–89.3)

 

Model 3

91.1 (78.8–97.5)

86.2 (75.3–93.5)

82.1 (72.9–89.2)

81.4 (73.1–87.9)

 

Model 4

89.6 (77.3–96.5)

90.0 (80.5–95.9)

86.4 (78.2–92.4)

84.4 (76.8–90.4)

Men

 Sensitivity (95 % CI)

 

Model 1

65.5 (45.7–82.1)

51.7 (32.5–70.6)

34.5 (17.9–54.3)

24.1 (10.3–43.5)

 

Model 2

69.0 (49.2–84.7)

51.7 (32.5–70.6)

31.0 (15.3–50.8)

20.7 (8.0–39.7)

 

Model 3

69.0 (49.2–84.7)

58.6 (38.9–76.5)

24.1 (10.3–43.5)

20.7 (8.0–39.7)

 

Model 4

72.4 (32.1–43.9)

51.7 (32.5–70.6)

24.1 (10.3–43.5)

24.1 (10.3–43.5)

 Specificity (95 % CI)

 

Model 1

44.1 (45.7–82.1)

58.8 (52.7–64.7)

73.2 (67.5–78.3)

79.8 (74.5–84.4)

 

Model 2

41.5 (35.6–47.6)

54.0 (47.9–60.1)

72.1 (66.3–77.3)

82.4 (77.3–86.7)

 

Model 3

38.6 (32.8–44.7)

53.7 (47.6–59.7)

73.2 (67.5–78.3)

83.1 (78.1–87.3)

 

Model 4

37.9 (32.1–43.9)

52.9 (46.8–59.0)

72.1 (66.3–77.3)

81.3 (76.1–85.7)

 Positive predictive value (95 % CI)

 

Model 1

11.1 (6.8–16.8)

11.8 (6.8–18.7)

12.0 (5.9–21.0)

11.3 (4.7–21.9)

 

Model 2

11.2 (7.0–16.7)

10.7 (6.1–17.1)

10.6 (5.0–19.2)

11.1 (4.2–22.6)

 

Model 3

10.7 (6.7–16.0)

11.9 (7.1–18.4)

8.8 (3.6–17.2)

11.5 (4.4–23.4)

 

Model 4

11.1 (7.0–16.4)

9.9 (5.5–16.0)

8.4 (3.5–16.6)

12.1 (5.0–23.3)

 Negative predictive value (95 % CI)

 

Model 1

92.3 (86.3–96.2)

92.0 (86.9–95.5)

91.3 (86.7–94.7)

90.8 (86.4–94.1)

 

Model 2

92.6 (86.5–96.6)

91.3 (85.8–95.2)

90.7 (86.1–94.3)

90.7 (86.4–94.0)

 

Model 3

92.1 (85.5–96.3)

92.4 (87.1–96.0)

90.0 (85.3–93.7)

90.8 (86.5–94.1)

 

Model 4

92.8 (86.3–96.8)

90.6 (84.9–94.6)

89.9 (85.1–93.6)

90.9 (86.6–94.2)

  1. Abbreviations: CI confidence interval; Model 1, Laboratory based model same as Framingham Risk Score; Model 2, Non laboratory based model; Model 3, WHO/ISH with Cholesterol; Model 4, WHO/ISH without Cholesterol