Peer Review reports
From: Utility of routine exercise treadmill testing early after percutaneous coronary intervention
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 13 Nov 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shuichi Hamasaki |
| 9 Dec 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronald Krone |
| 27 Dec 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Eisenberg |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 27 Dec 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 15 Jan 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronald Krone |
| 5 Feb 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Eisenberg |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 5 Feb 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 22 Feb 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronald Krone |
| 21 Mar 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Eisenberg |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 21 Mar 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 23 Mar 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Eisenberg |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 23 Mar 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 29 Mar 2007 | Editorially accepted | |
| 29 Mar 2007 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2261-7-12 |
You can find further information about peer review here.