Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
21 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
7 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter ten Dijke |
16 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carmelo Bernabeu |
1 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marie-Jose Goumans |
21 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Andreas Lux |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
21 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
25 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter ten Dijke |
5 Mar 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marie-Jose Goumans |
7 Mar 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carmelo Bernabeu |
14 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Andreas Lux |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
14 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
23 Mar 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carmelo Bernabeu |
24 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Andreas Lux |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
31 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Andreas Lux |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
31 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
4 Apr 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
4 Apr 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2261-6-13 |
You can find further information about peer review here.