Skip to main content

Advertisement

Peer Review reports

From: Accuracy of popular automatic QT Interval algorithms assessed by a 'Gold Standard' and comparison with a Novel method: computer simulation study

Original Submission
12 May 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
25 May 2005 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Charles Hunt
Resubmission - Version 2
25 May 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Jun 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Van Leeuwen
29 Jun 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Macfarlane
1 Jul 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Kors
27 Jul 2005 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Charles Hunt
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Jul 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Aug 2005 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Charles Hunt
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Aug 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 Aug 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Van Leeuwen
15 Sep 2005 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Charles Hunt
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Sep 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
26 Sep 2005 Editorially accepted
26 Sep 2005 Article published 10.1186/1471-2261-5-29

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page