Skip to main content

Table 1 A representation of the geometric changes in time expressed in weeks

From: A comparison of balloon injury models of endovascular lesions in rat arteries

Parameter

Time

carotid SEM

aorta SEM

iliac SEM

MLD in mm

0

0.86 ± 0.04

1.53 ± 0.05

0.99 ± 0.02

 

1

0.98 ± 0.02

1.63 ± 0.08

1.09 ± 0.02

 

2

0.89 ± 0.03

1.70 ± 0.07

1.14 ± 0.04

 

3

0.97 ± 0.04

1.45 ± 0.07

1.17 ± 0.05

 

4

0.67 ± 0.05

1.47 ± 0.09

1.06 ± 0.03

 

16

0.37 ± 0.10

1.46 ± 0.09

0.77 ± 0.07

Media in mm2

0

0.10 ± 0.00

0.25 ± 0.03

0.13 ± 0.00

 

1

0.13 ± 0.01

0.32 ± 0.01

0.18 ± 0.01

 

2

0.13 ± 0.01

0.35 ± 0.02

0.21 ± 0.01

 

3

0.14 ± 0.01

0.40 ± 0.01

0.21 ± 0.01

 

4

0.11 ± 0.00

0.32 ± 0.02

0.19 ± 0.01

 

16

0.13 ± 0.01

0.28 ± 0.02

0.15 ± 0.01

Medial Thickness in mm

0

0.06 ± 0.00

0.09 ± 0.01

0.08 ± 0.00

 

1

0.07 ± 0.00

0.14 ± 0.02

0.09 ± 0.00

 

2

0.08 ± 0.00

0.12 ± 0.01

0.10 ± 0.01

 

3

0.08 ± 0.01

0.14 ± 0.00

0.10 ± 0.00

 

4

0.09 ± 0.00

0.13 ± 0.01

0.09 ± 0.01

 

16

0.09 ± 0.00

0.11 ± 0.01

0.08 ± 0.00

  1. (vertically in ascending order) after balloon injury in respectively (horizontally ordered) the right common carotid artery (CCA), abdominal aorta (AA) and right common iliac artery (CIA). The mean parameters (maximal lumen diameter (MLD), media area and maximal media thickness) are subsequently given. MLD: CCA 16 vs 0 p < 0.001; CIA 16 vs 0 p < 0.0001;CCA 1 vs 0 p < 0.0003; AA 2 vs 0 p < 0.002; CIA 3 vs 0 p < 0.004. Media area: CCA 3 vs 0 p < 0.001; AA 3 vs 0 p < 0.0001; CIA 3 vs 0 p < 0.0001. THMAX: CCA 16 vs 0 p < 0.002; AA 3 vs 0 p < 0.0001; CIA 3 vs 0 p < 0.0001