Skip to main content

Table 3 Description of baseline and follow-up strategies (N = 72 Hospitals)

From: Strategies to reduce hospital 30-day risk-standardized mortality rates for patients with acute myocardial infarction: a cross-sectional and longitudinal survey

Survey Item

Baseline12010 survey N (%)

Follow up22013 survey N (%)

McNemar’s P-value

Quality Improvement and Monitoring

   

Hospital had a QI team devoted to improving inpatient mortality in patients with AMI

45 (62.5%)

54 (77.1%)

0.108

Hospital had QI team to improve post-discharge mortality in patients with AMI

17 (23.6%)

30 (43.5%)

0.024

Hospital had a designated person or group to review deaths of patients with AMI that occurred during hospitalization

63 (87.5%)

58 (84.1%)

0.607

Hospital had a designated person or group to review deaths of patients with AMI that occurred within 30 days of admission

16 (22.2%)

25 (36.2%)

0.163

Hospital had a regular ‘morbidity and mortality’ conferences (or another educational session) for discussing individual cases involving patients with AMI

40 (55.6%)

35 (51.5%)

0.851

Hospital was part of a regional effort or consortium of hospitals to improve AMI care

53 (73.6%)

56 (81.2%)

0.442

Strategies for Pre-Hospital and In-Patient Care

   

Hospital provided training to EMS providers about AMI care monthly or quarterly

26 (36.1%)

42 (60.9%)

<0.001

Clinicians from your hospital met with EMS providers to review the care of patients with AMI

  

0.458

    Yes, about monthly

29 (40.3%)

32 (51.6%)

 

    Other than monthly

43 (59.7%)

30 (48.4%)

Hospital had 1 or more physician or nurse champions focused on improving either inpatient or 30-day mortality in patients with AMI

  

0.5183

    Neither physician nor nurse champion

23 (31.9%)

17 (24.6%)

 

    Nurse champion only

4 (5.6%)

1 (1.5%)

    Physician champion only

9 (12.5%)

11 (15.9%)

    Both physician and nurse champion

36 (50.0%)

40 (58.0%)

On the inpatient units, hospital had computerized assisted physician order entry

24 (33.3%)

57 (82.6%)

<0.001

Non-interventional or interventional cardiologists or cardiology fellows were at the hospital 24-hours/day and 7-days/week

10 (14.5%)

16 (23.2%)

0.238

Nurses in at least one of your critical care areas were cross-trained to cover in the catheterization laboratory

12 (16.7%)

8 (11.6%)

0.607

Which of the following best describes the role of pharmacists in caring for patients with AMI during this time?

  

0.9153

    Pharmacists round on all patients in the CCU or with AMI

32 (45.7%)

31 (46.3%)

 

    Pharmacists do not round, but review the medications of all patients with AMI

24 (34.3%)

23 (34.3%)

    Pharmacists do not have a specific role in the care of patients with AMI

14 (20.0%)

13 (19.4%)

Organizational Culture

   

Clinicians are encouraged to creatively solve problems related to AMI care processes.

  

1.000

    Never, rarely or sometimes

12 (16.7%)

12 (17.7%)

 

    Usually or always

60 (83.3%)

56 (82.4%)

There is good coordination among the different departments involved with the care of patients with AMI.

  

0.012

    Never, rarely, or sometimes

3 (4.2%)

11 (16.2%)

 

    Usually or always

69 (95.8%)

57 (83.8%)

Clinicians caring for patients with AMI share new evidence-based approaches with the AMI team.

  

1.000

    Never, rarely, or sometimes

14 (19.4%)

12 (17.7%)

 

    Usually or always

58 (80.6%)

56 (82.4%)

Departments caring for patients with AMI (e.g., cardiology, emergency medicine) communicate easily with each other.

  

0.035

    Never, rarely or sometimes

4 (5.6%)

12 (17.9%)

 

    Usually or always

68 (94.4%)

55 (82.1%)

Mistakes have led to positive changes in AMI care processes at the hospital.

  

0.557

    Never, rarely, or sometimes

19 (26.4%)

23 (33.8%)

    Usually or always

53 (73.6%)

45 (66.2%)

 
  1. 1Number of missing responses range from 0 to 3.
  2. 2Number of missing items range from 3 to 5; one item missing 10.
  3. 3Tests of symmetry used.