Skip to main content
Figure 2 | BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

Figure 2

From: Infarct quantification using 3D inversion recovery and 2D phase sensitive inversion recovery; validation in patients and ex vivo

Figure 2

Patient infarct quantification. Agreement between 2D-PSIR and 3D-IR in absolute infarct volume in patients. (A) 2D-PSIR versus 3D-IR (r = 0.97) and the line of identity (B) The limits of agreement between the two LGE-techniques. The difference between the two methods was 0.47 ± 2.1 ml scar. Solid line = mean difference; dashed lines = ± 2 SD.

Back to article page

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us