Skip to main content

Table 2 OAC initiation regimens and guideline adherence according to speciality and health care setting

From: The health care setting rather than medical speciality impacts on physicians adherence to guideline-conform anticoagulation in outpatients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a cross sectional survey

 

All

 

Ambulatory care

 

Hospital care

  

GP

IM

CA

 

OAC initiation regimen N (%)

221 (100)

52 (23.5)

64 (29.0)

31 (14)

74 (33.5)*

- OAC alone loading dose

39 (17.7)

9 (17.3)

14 (21.9)

7 (22.6)

9 (12.2)

- OAC alone

30 (13.6)

5 (9.6)

3 (4.7)

2 (6.5)

20 (27.1)

- OAC + LMWH prophylactic dose

34 (15.4)

13 (25.0)

10 (15.6)

6 (19.4)

5 (6.8)

- OAC + LMWH therapeutic dose

104 (47.1)

18 (34.6)

31 (48.4)

16 (51.6)

39 (52.7)

- OAC + Aspirin

4 (1.8)

2 (3.9)

2 (3.1)

0 (0)

0 (0)

- Aspirin alone

5 (2.3)

4 (7.7)

1 (1.6)

0 (0)

0 (0)

- Various

5 (2.3)

1 (1.9)

3 (4.7)

0 (0)

1 (1.4)

Guideline conform OAC initiation (%)

134 (60.6)

23 (44.2)

34 (53.1)

18 (58.19)

59 (79.7)*

Long-term OAC regimen (%)

207 (93.7)

45 (86.5)

58 (90.6)

31 (100)

73 (98.7)*

  1. Total N = 221, 5 respondents were excluded due to multiple responses thus a sound classification of the OAC initiation regimen was not possible; * p < 0.05 vs. ambulatory care setting (GP, IM, CA)