Skip to main content

Table 2 Responses to questions on awareness of guidelines

From: Adherence to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for chronic heart failure - A national survey of the cardiologists in Pakistan

 

n (%)

Awareness of existing guidelines

 

Not aware of any

8 (2.6)

American (AHA)

281 (92.1)

European (ESC)

124 (40.7)

Pakistan

36 (11.8)

Relevance of CHF guidelines in making treatment choices

 

Not relevant

3 (1.0)

Relevant

165 (54.1)

Very relevant

137 (44.9)

Most relevant guidelines

 

AHA

283 (92.8)

ESC

42 (13.8)

Pakistan

19 (6.2)

Do you follow guidelines you are aware of closely?

 

Yes

266 (87.2)

Are you well informed with the latest update of the guidelines you follow?

 

Yes

231 (75.7)

Major source of information about CHF guidelines

 

My training

195 (63.9)

Colleagues

70 (23.0)

Journals

244 (80.0)

Professional meetings

180 (59.0)

Drug representatives

19 (6.2)

Internet

222 (72.8)

Journals read on a regular basis

 

Heart

168 (55.1)

NEJM

120 (39.3)

Circulation

182 (59.7)

Lancet

83 (27.2)

JPMA (Local indexed journal)

89 (29.2)

  1. AHA, American Heart Association; ESC, European Society of Cardiology; JPMA, Journal of Pakistan Medical Association