Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
28 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
22 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Emily Lai |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
22 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
14 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephane Arques |
6 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nicolas Danchin |
18 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jack Tu |
1 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Emily Lai |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
1 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Emily Lai |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
1 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Emily Lai |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
4 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephane Arques |
23 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jack Tu |
6 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Emily Lai |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
6 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
18 Sep 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Sep 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2261-11-56 |
You can find further information about peer review here.