Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
14 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
28 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amteshwar jaggi |
28 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vishal Diwan |
4 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Birendra Kumar ROY |
8 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Derek Hausenloy |
10 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Lesnefsky |
11 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Harlokesh Yadav |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
11 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
18 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Birendra Kumar ROY |
24 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vishal Diwan |
27 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amteshwar jaggi |
31 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Derek Hausenloy |
15 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Lesnefsky |
2 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Harlokesh Yadav |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
2 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
8 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Harlokesh Yadav |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
8 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
12 Jul 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
12 Jul 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2261-11-43 |
You can find further information about peer review here.