Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carlos Tirapelli |
15 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wilson Nadruz |
19 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Antonio Casella-Filho |
2 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Juan Yugar-Toledo |
27 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Harnek |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Antonio Casella-Filho |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
9 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carlos Tirapelli |
18 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wilson Nadruz |
22 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Juan Yugar-Toledo |
26 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Harnek |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
26 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
9 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Harnek |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
9 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
11 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
11 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2261-11-30 |
You can find further information about peer review here.