Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kathleen Mc Entee |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
4 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
11 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Steven Lavine |
22 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Juichiro Shimizu |
28 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Halliday Idikio |
27 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kathleen Mc Entee |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
27 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
6 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Steven Lavine |
15 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Halliday Idikio |
24 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Juichiro Shimizu |
28 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kathleen Mc Entee |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
28 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
29 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kathleen Mc Entee |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
29 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
29 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2261-10-32 |
You can find further information about peer review here.