Skip to main content

Table 2 Accuracies and Predictive Values of Pooled Conventional versus A-ECG Criteria in the Training Set

From: Accuracy of advanced versus strictly conventional 12-lead ECG for detection and screening of coronary artery disease, left ventricular hypertrophy and left ventricular systolic dysfunction

 

Disease (N = 290)

Healthy (N = 418)

    
 

TP

FN

TN

FP

Sensitivity(CLs)

Specificity(CLs)

Accuracy(CLs)

Conventional ECG status

        

Abnormal (nominal pooled criteria)

221

69

352

66

76%(71-81%)

84%(80-88%)

81%(78-84%)

Abnormal (optimized pooled criteria)

223

67

368

50

77%(72-82%)

88%(85-91%)

83%(81-86%)

Best individual parameter status

        

Abnormal QTVI in lead II (>-1.64 units)

242

48

359

59

83%(79-88%)

86%(82-89%)

85%(82-87%)

Best 1° A-ECG scores status

        

"Full Disclosure" (5-min) A-ECG:

        

Abnormal 9-parameter score*

273

17

402

16

94%(91-97%)‡

96%(94-98%)‡

95%(94-97%)‡

Abnormal 7-parameter score*

268

22

398

20

92%(89-95%)‡

95%(93-97%)‡

94%(92-95%)‡

"Snapshot" (10-sec) A-ECG:

        

Abnormal 7-parameter score

258

32

395

23

89%(85-92%)‡

94%(92-96%)‡

92%(90-94%)‡

 

Disease

+LVSD

(N = 102)

Disease

no LVSD

(N = 188)

    
 

TP

FN

TN

FP

PPV (CLs)

NPV (CLs)

+LR

-LR

Conventional ECG status

        

Abnormal (nominal pooled criteria)

92

10

60

128

42%(35-49%)

86%(75-93%)

1.32

0.31

Abnormal (optimized pooled criteria)

94

8

59

129

42%(36-49%)

88%(78-95%)

1.34

0.25

Best individual parameter status

        

Abnormal Z integral (>12.4 mV*ms)

77

25

153

35

69%(59-77%)†

86%(80-91%)

4.05

0.30

Best 2° A-ECG scores status

        

Abnormal 5-parameter score

79

23

173

15

77%(68-85%)‡

92%(87-95%)

9.71

0.25

  1. See text for definitions of nominal versus optimized pooled criteria for "abnormal" conventional ECGs. A-ECG, advanced ECG; LVSD, left ventricular systolic dysfunction; TP and FP, true and false positives; TN and FN, true and false negatives; CLs, exact 95% binomial confidence limits; PPV and NPV, positive and negative predictive values; +LR and -LR, positive and negative likelihood ratios; QTVI, QT interval variability index; Z integral, the total integral of the Z-lead QRS complex above 5 Hz.
  2. *The 9-parameter 1° A-ECG score performed best in the training set whereas the 7-parameter 1° A-ECG score ultimately performed best in the test set (Table 3). All results shown for A-ECG scores are jackknifed.
  3. †P < 0.05 and ‡P < 0.0001 versus the optimized pooled conventional ECG criteria.