Association of cardiac and renal function with extreme N-terminal fragment Pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels in elderly patients

  • Hua Cui1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Guoliang Huo1Email author,

      Affiliated with

      • Lin Liu1,

        Affiliated with

        • Li Fan1Email author,

          Affiliated with

          • Ping Ye1,

            Affiliated with

            • Jian Cao1,

              Affiliated with

              • Yongyi Bai1,

                Affiliated with

                • Fan Wang1 and

                  Affiliated with

                  • Yixin Hu1

                    Affiliated with

                    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders201212:57

                    DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-12-57

                    Received: 19 January 2012

                    Accepted: 26 July 2012

                    Published: 26 July 2012

                    Abstract

                    Background

                    The data are inconsistent regarding whether extreme N-terminal fragment pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT pro-BNP) levels are associated with impaired renal function. Furthermore, the relationship between extreme NT pro-BNP levels and cardiac and renal function in elderly patients has not been reported. The aim of the present study was to examine a hypothesis that extreme NT pro-BNP levels may be associated with impaired cardiac and renal function in elderly patients.

                    Methods

                    We retrospectively analyzed the data of demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic features on 152 consecutive elderly patients aged more than 80 years old (average age, 83.65 ± 3.58 years) with NT pro-BNP levels ≥ 3000 pg/ml. The participants were divided into two categories according to their NT pro-BNP levels: (1) 3000–10000 pg/mL and (2) >10000 pg /mL.

                    Results

                    The number of patients with impaired renal function (P = 0.019) and the mortality (P < 0.001) in the period of inpatient was higher in the group with NT pro-BNP > 10000 pg /mL. The levels of serum creatinine and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) in the group of NT pro-BNP > 10000 pg / mL were higher than those in the group of NT pro-BNP = 3000-10000 pg/mL (P = 0.001 and P = 0.023, respectively). Furthermore, no significant difference in the distribution by NYHA class in different NT pro-BNP levels was observed. Multiple linear regression analyses demonstrated that with NT pro-BNP levels as the dependent variable, NT pro-BNP levels were positively correlated with CK-MB (β = 0.182, P = 0.024) and creatinine levels (β = 0.281, P = 0.001). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve of NT pro-BNP levels and clinical diagnosis of impaired renal function was 0.596 and reached significant difference (95%CI:0.503-0.688, P = 0.044).

                    Conclusion

                    These data suggest that the extreme elevation of NT pro-BNP levels (≥3000 pg/ml) is mainly determined by impaired renal function in elderly patients above 80 years. Extreme NT pro-BNP levels may be useful for assessing the severity of impaired renal function.

                    Keywords

                    NT pro-BNP Factors Elderly Impaired renal function

                    Background

                    B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP; 77–108 amino acids) and its N-terminal (1–76 amino acids) counterpart, NT-proBNP, are cardiac biomarkers that have been established for the assessment of left ventricular dysfunction and congestive heart failure. Respecting NT pro-BNP has a longer half-life than BNP, measurements of circulating levels of NT pro-BNP have been prior recommended in the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with symptoms of left ventricular dysfunction [13]. In addition, NT pro-BNP testing is also important in the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of patients with Chronic kidney disease (CKD) [4]. However, Law et al. [5] revealed that extreme values of BNP were not associated with kidney dysfunction or the presence of HF, cardiomyopathy. Interestingly, Guglin et al. [6] demonstrated extremely high BNP levels (4000–20,000 pg/mL) were correlated with renal dysfunction measured by serum creatinine levels.

                    CKD is regarded as an important problem in elderly patients, which is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The prevalence of CKD rises rapidly in individuals older than 60 years of age [7]. It is well documented that adults lose about 1 mL/min/y of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from the age of 40 to 45 years. Given the increased incidence of impaired renal function and NT pro-BNP levels in elderly patients [8], we hypothesized that extreme NT pro-BNP levels may be associated with impaired renal function in elderly patients. Furthermore, the relationship between extreme NT pro-BNP levels and cardiac and renal function in elderly patients has not been reported. The aim of the present study was to examine the hypothesis that extreme NT pro-BNP levels may be associated with impaired cardiac and renal function in elderly patients.

                    Methods

                    Ethical approval of the study protocol

                    This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. It was approved by the Scientific and Ethics Review Board of the Department of Geriatrics, Chinese PLA General Hospital (Beijing, PR China). All patients provided written informed consent to be included in the study.

                    Participants

                    We screened for elderly patients ≥ 80 years, hospitalized between April 2010 and January 2011, whose NT pro-BNP values were ≥ 3000 pg/mL regardless of diagnosis. According to the NT pro-BNP levels, the patients were divided into two categories: 3000–10000 pg/mL and > 10000 pg/mL. The cutoff of NT pro-BNP level was chosen arbitrarily.

                    NT pro-BNP was determined by chemiluminescence immunoassay, ADVIA Centaur™ system (Roche Inc.), and was expressed as pg/ml. The normal value for the NT pro-BNP test was <150 pg/mL. From the values >3000 pg/mL measured during the same hospital admission, we calculated the average number. Laboratory indicators, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) and creatinine levels,which may be correlated with the NT pro-BNP level, were also collected on the same day when NT pro-BNP exceeded 3000 pg/mL.

                    We reviewed medical records of all patients enrolled, including history and physical examination findings, progress notes and the data of instrumental and laboratory diagnostic tests. From the clinical records available, we made the diagnosis of heart failure (HF) and estimated functional class by the New York Heart Association (NYHA).

                    Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated by means of echocardiographic study using Simpson’s rule. Other parameters of structural and functional of heart, such as left atrial diameter, right atrial diameter, interventricular septum, posterior wall, left ventricular end systolic diameter (LVESD) and left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), fractional shortening (FS) were also reviewed from electronic medical records closed to the day when NT pro-BNP exceeded 3000 pg/mL. Serum creatinine levels were recorded on the same day that NT pro-BNP exceeded 3000 pg/mL. Impaired renal function was defined as a serum creatinine level > 1.5 mg/dL [9].

                    Statistical analysis

                    Results are presented as mean ± SD, as median and interquartile ranges, or as percentages and numbers for categorical data. Normality and homogeneity of variances were tested for all variables. NT pro-BNP was natural logarithmically transformed to normalize their distributions. The Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U two-sample tests (if the distribution was not normal) were used to compare the continuous variables between the two groups. Categorical data and proportions were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U or kruskal Wallis H test where appropriate. Variables potentially associated with the plasma concentration of NT pro-BNP in all subjects were analyzed by linear regression analyses. The relationship between NT pro-BNP and clinical diagnosis of HF or impaired renal function was tested with the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows version 16.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

                    Results

                    Patient characteristics

                    Demographics are provided in Table 1. One hundred and fifty-two consecutive patients (91 men and 61 women) with an age ranging from 80 to 94 (mean age, 83.65 ± 3.58 yr) were enrolled and underwent statistical analysis. Among them, the NT pro-BNP levels of 108 patients (66 men) were between 3000 pg/mL and 10000 pg/mL (group A), 44 (25 men) ≥10000 pg/mL (group B). Of the 152 participants, 16 patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction, 69 with HF or HF exacerbation, and 24 patients died during their hospitalization. Among 83 patients without HF symptoms, the main reason of being hospitalized, including infections (35 patients); brain damage such as stroke and Parkinson’s disease (11 patients); cancer (25 patients); and miscellaneous conditions (remaining 12 patients).
                    Table 1

                    Baseline characteristics of the enrolled patients with elevated NT pro-BNP levels

                     

                    NT pro-BNP 3000-10000 pg/mL ( group A, n = 108)

                    NT pro-BNP ≥10000 pg/mL (group B, n = 44)

                    P

                    Age (years)

                    83.57 ± 3.33

                    83.84 ± 4.18

                    0.679

                    Male, n (%)

                    66 (61.1)

                    25 (56.8)

                    0.625

                    BMI (kg/m2)

                    22.64 ± 3.79

                    21.50 ± 3.33

                    0.084

                    SBP(mm Hg)

                    126.69 ± 20.21

                    128.39 ± 23.19

                    0.653

                    DBP (mm Hg)

                    68.25 ± 12.37

                    66.32 ± 16.54

                    0.487

                    Underlying commodities disease, n (%)

                       

                    Coronary artery disease

                    89(82.4)

                    37(84.1)

                    0.803

                    Atrial fibrillation

                    43(39.8)

                    15(84.1)

                    0.447

                    Diabetes mellitus

                    37(34.3)

                    19(43.2)

                    0.303

                    Hypertension

                    81(75.0)

                    36(81.8)

                    0.367

                    COPD

                    13(12.0)

                    4(99.1)

                    0.602

                    Respiratory failure

                    13(12.0)

                    7(15.9)

                    0.523

                    Cancer

                    29(26.9)

                    10(22.7)

                    0.860

                    Liver disease

                    10(9.3)

                    5(11.4)

                    0.694

                    MODS

                    6(5.6)

                    1(2.3)

                    0.383

                    Impaired renal function

                    39(36.1)

                    25(56.8)

                    0.019

                    Infection

                    57(52.8)

                    28(63.6)

                    0.223

                    Acute myocardial infarction

                    7(6.5)

                    4(9.1)

                    0.951

                    Death

                    9(8.3)

                    15(34.1)

                    <0.001

                    Echocardiographic parameters

                       

                    LVEF (%)

                    54.88 ± 10.44

                    53.41 ± 9.98

                    0.427

                    Left atrial diameter (mm)

                    39.39 ± 6.43

                    38.07 ± 5.34

                    0.231

                    Right atrial diameter (mm)

                    37.81 ± 6.85

                    36.39 ± 5.22

                    0.216

                    Interventricular septum (mm)

                    10.69 ± 1.57

                    10.80 ± 1.75

                    0.729

                    Posterior wall (mm)

                    10.06 ± 1.28

                    10.14 ± 1.75

                    0.753

                    LV diastolic dimension (mm)

                    49.98 ± 6.51

                    50.55 ± 5.42

                    0.613

                    LV systolic dimension (mm)

                    35.67 ± 6.41

                    35.93 ± 5.74

                    0.265

                    Fractional shortening (%)

                    29.81 ± 5.72

                    29.20 ± 4.79

                    0.297

                    Laboratory data

                       

                    Creatinine (mg/dL)

                    1.24(0.92-1.82)

                    1.39(0.91-4.57)

                    0.001

                    CK-MB (ng/dL)

                    2.5(0.90-368)

                    3.63(1.72-5.77)

                    0.023

                    Serum albumin(g/dL)

                    33.44 ± 5.11

                    32.83 ± 6.76

                    0.540

                    C-reactive protein (mg/dL)

                    3.07(0.86-7.58)

                    3.44(1.025-8.6)

                    0.375

                    Medication, n (%)

                       

                    ACEIs or ARBs

                    7 (6.5)

                    20 (45.5)

                    0.803

                    β-blockers

                    16(36.4)

                    48(44.4)

                    0.362

                    NT pro-BNP, N-terminal fragment pro-B-type natriuretic peptide;NS, not significant; BMI, body mass index; SBP, Systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure ;HF, heart failure; LV, left ventricular; MODS, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome; CK-MB, MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Data were shown as mean ± SD, percentages and median values (quartile 1, quartile 3) for different parameters.

                    There were no significant differences between the group A and the group B, when comparing age; having atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or liver diseases; echocardiographic parameters; and medications. More patients with impaired renal function (P = 0.019) and higher mortality (P < 0.001) in the period of hospitalization were found in the group B when compared to group A. The levels of serum creatinine and the CK-MB in the group B were higher than that in the group A (P = 0.001, P = 0.023 respectively), but no difference trend appeared in serum albumin and C-reactive protein between the two groups.

                    No significant difference in the distribution by NYHA class in different NT-pro BNP levels was observed between the group A and B presented in Table 2.
                    Table 2

                    Distribution patients by NYHA class in different NT pro-BNP Levels

                     

                    NT pro-BNP 3000–10000 (pg/mL, %) ( group A, n = 108)

                    NT pro-BNP ≥10000 (pg/mL, %) ( group B, n = 44)

                    P

                    NYHAI

                    23 (21)

                    7 (16)

                    NS

                    NYHAII

                    36 (34)

                    13 (30)

                    NS

                    NYHAIII

                    31 (38)

                    15 (34)

                    NS

                    NYHAIV

                    18 (17)

                    9 (20)

                    NS

                    NYHA, New York Heart Association class; NT pro-BNP, N-terminal fragment pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.

                    Correlation and ROC analyses

                    Correlation analyses showed that NT pro-BNP levels were positively correlated with CK-MB (r = 0.162, P = 0.050) and creatinine (r = 0.237, P = 0.003). Multiple linear regression analyses demonstrated that with NT-pro BNP levels as the dependent variable, NT pro-BNP levels were positively correlated with CK-MB (β = 0.182, P = 0.024) and creatinine (β = 0.281, P = 0.001)(Table 3). The area under the ROC curve of NT pro-BNP levels and clinical diagnosis of HF was 0.582 and was not significant (95%CI:0.474-0.690, p = 0.164) (Figure 1). However, the area under the ROC curve of NT pro-BNP levels and clinical diagnosis of impaired renal function was 0.596 and reached significant difference (95%CI:0.503-0.688, p = 0.044) (Figure 1).
                    Table 3

                    Correlation between clinical data, echocardiographic parameters, laboratory data and NT pro-BNP levels

                     

                    Univariate

                    Multivariate

                     

                    r

                    P

                    β

                    P

                    Age

                    −0.017

                    0.832

                    -

                    NS

                    BMI

                    −0.134

                    0.099

                    −0.151

                    0.058

                    Systolic blood pressure

                    −0.029

                    0.726

                    -

                    NS

                    Diastolic blood pressure

                    −0.122

                    0.134

                    -

                    NS

                    Echocardiographic parameters

                        

                    LVEF

                    −0.085

                    0.300

                    -

                    NS

                    Left atrial diameter

                    −0.031

                    0.701

                    -

                    NS

                    Right atrial diameter

                    −0.093

                    0.254

                    -

                    NS

                    Interventricular septum

                    −0.078

                    0.341

                    -

                    NS

                    Posterior wall

                    −0.022

                    0.787

                    -

                    NS

                    LV diastolic dimension

                    0.054

                    0.512

                    -

                    NS

                    LV systolic dimension

                    0.028

                    0.730

                    -

                    NS

                    Fractional shortening

                    0.012

                    0.883

                     

                    NS

                    Laboratory data

                        

                    Creatinine

                    0.237

                    0.003

                    0.281

                    0.001

                    CK-MB

                    0.162

                    0.050

                    0.182

                    0.024

                    Serum albumin,

                    −0.078

                    0.337

                    -

                    NS

                    C-reactive protein

                    0.131

                    0.341

                    -

                    NS

                    NT pro-BNP, N-terminal fragment pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; NS, not significant; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HF, heart failure; LV, left ventricular; CK-MB, MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase.

                    http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2261-12-57/MediaObjects/12872_2012_452_Fig1_HTML.jpg
                    Figure 1

                    The ROC curve of NT pro-BNP levels and clinical diagnosis of HF (Figure A) and impaired renal function (Figure B). AUC = area under the curve; CI = confidence interval; ROC = receiver-operating characteristic.

                    Discussion

                    In the present study, we found extreme NT pro-BNP levels were positively correlated with creatinine levels and the evaluation of impaired renal function in elderly patients. Elevated NT pro-BNP levels are common in patients with CKD, as it showed in the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Nitta and colleagues [10] reported that the mean serum NT pro-BNP concentration was higher in haemodialysis patients than in normal healthy subjects. Yang et al. [11] demonstrated that BNP levels of patients with CKD showed a positive correlation with creatinine levels, and a high concentration of BNP can be seen in patients with stage 5 CKD without heart failure. After analyzing 277 patients with CKD, Prnjavorac et al. [12] found that NT pro-BNP increased at the beginning of water overload in patients with CKD. However, Law et al. [5] demonstrated that BNP levels were not correlated with the presence of renal dysfunction in 113 patients with BNP value >3000 pg/mL. The major reason for this inconsistency maybe that patients with an age ranging from 21 to 102 were enrolled in Law’s study , which may lead to different result regarding BNP levels determined by age. Moreover, our results are similar to the study by Guglin et al. [6], who also found high BNP levels (4000–20,000 pg/mL) were associated with kidney dysfunction. Although the data are inconsistent, our results suggest in elderly patients, the extreme NT pro-BNP may be more useful for the assessment of the severity of impaired renal function. Certainly, further studies are still needed to ascertain the relationship between extreme BNP levels and impaired renal function in large sample size.

                    Previous evidence demonstrated that BNP testing is a useful tool for the diagnosis or stratification of decompensated heart failure [13, 14]. Most studies have confirmed that BNP is associated with the severity of HF in a certain range. However, a study regardless of age published in 2010 demonstrated that extreme values of BNP do not correlate with the presence of HF [15]. Our results also showed that there was no significant difference in the distribution by NYHA class and LVEF in different NT pro-BNP levels. There are several possible reasons for this phenomenon. Firstly, immunoassays play an important role in falsely elevating BNP levels, which are used in the clinical setting and do not determine precise molecular forms of these natriuretic peptides. A review showed antibodies against BNP may also recognize and bind to pro-BNP and NT-fragments [16]. Meanwhile, analysis from chromatography-based studies revealed that inactive pro-BNP forms often predominate in HF,. This indicates that the bioactive forms of natriuretic peptides may not be processed proportionally in patients with advanced HF. Secondly, inflammation may be associated with falsely elevating BNP levels. Because one study had demonstrated that inflammatory markers were positively correlated with BNP levels, suggesting a link between elevations of BNP levels and inflammation [17].

                    Through a systematic review of 19 studies, Doust and colleagues found that NT pro-BNP is a strong prognostic indicator for both asymptomatic patients and for patients with heart failure at all stages of disease, and for every 100 ng/L rise in NT pro-BNP concentration, there was a corresponding 35% increase in the relative risk of death [18]. Additionally, a previous cohort study showed that NT pro-BNP was found to be a good predictor of mortality in elderly with and without specific cardiac diagnoses [19]. Bettencourt and colleagues [20] also demonstrated that NT pro-BNP levels were the strongest independent predictor of death or hospital readmission during hospitalization and six months of follow-up. In the extremely elevated geriatric population above 80 years, we found higher levels of NT pro-BNP with higher mortality. These results confirmed that even with the level above 3000 pg/ml and suggested that NT pro-BNP may be also an independent predictor of death in elderly patients with or without cardiac disease.

                    In the early phase of AMI, NT pro-BNP gene expression increases considerably, the phenomenon also can be seen in human cardiac allograft acute rejection [21]. Therefore, NT pro-BNP is a useful marker of reflection injury of myocardium function and prognostic of myocardial infarction [22]. Moreover, NT pro-BNP level is similar to BNP in circulation of healthy volunteers and it proportionally increse as cardiac function deterioration [23, 24]. After compared the predictive value of NT pro-BNP and other frequently used biomarkers, Melki et al. recently found that NT pro-BNP may be the best single predictor of left ventricular function in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes [25]. In the present study, although there was no difference in the ratio of acute myocardial infarction patients in admission in different level of NT pro-BNP, we found the weak correlation between NT pro-BNP and CK-MB, and higher levels of CK-MB accompanied with higher NT pro-BNP, suggests elevated CK-MB levels derived from AMI contribute to the elevation of NT pro-BNP.

                    In recent years, CRP has emerged as a possible potent risk marker for cardiovascular diseases [26, 27]. The correlation between CRP and BNP levels has also been demonstrated [17], which means a possible interaction between natriuretic peptides and the systemic inflammatory response. Conversely, Caroline and collegues [28] found that CRP levels are not independently associated with first cardiovascular events in older individuals, and increasing age seems to attenuate the association between plasma CRP levels and the risk of cardiovascular disease. We also observed the levels of CRP in the study, but didn’t find the correlation between NT pro-BNP and CRP.

                    In addition, multiple factors are known to influence the circulating levels of NT pro-BNP. The prevalence of possible influencing factors including gender, body mass index (BMI), anemia and medications for heart failure such as ACE inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, beta blockers [2931], but in the present study, we didn’t find the correlation between BNP and all of them. Maybe these parameters are just confounding variables, and the underlying mechanism still needs to be further revealed.

                    There are several limitations in the present study. Firstly, the cutoff of NT pro-BNP for the enrolment and groups was established arbitrarily. Secondly, we only enrolled elderly patients above 80 years, and the population with the characteristics of more comorbidities and more severe conditions, that bring about a more confounding factor.

                    Conclusions

                    In conclusion, our results suggest that in elderly patients above 80 years, extreme elevation of NT pro-BNP (≥3000 pg/ml) is mainly determined by impaired renal function. Extreme NT pro-BNP levels may be useful for the assessment of the severity of impaired renal function.

                    Abbreviations

                    NT pro-BNP: 

                    N-terminal fragment pro-B-type natriuretic peptide

                    CK-MB: 

                    Creatine kinase MB

                    CKD: 

                    Chronic kidney disease

                    GFR: 

                    Glomerular filtration rate

                    CRP: 

                    C-reactive protein

                    HF: 

                    Heart failure

                    NYHA: 

                    New York heart association

                    CAD: 

                    Coronary artery disease

                    ROC: 

                    Receiver-operating characteristic

                    LVEF: 

                    Left ventricular ejection fraction

                    LVESD: 

                    Left ventricular end systolic diameter

                    LVEDD: 

                    Left ventricular end diastolic diameter

                    FS: 

                    Fractional shortening.

                    Declarations

                    Acknowledgment and funding

                    This work was supported by the Healthcare Fund 06MA290 and Fund of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2009BAI86B04).

                    Authors’ Affiliations

                    (1)
                    Second Geriatric Cardiology Division, Chinese PLA General Hospital

                    References

                    1. Levin ER, Gardner DG, Samson WK: Natriuretic peptides. N Engl J Med 1998, 339:321–328.PubMedView Article
                    2. Daniels LB, Maisel AS: Natriuretic peptides. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 50:2357–2368.PubMedView Article
                    3. Dickstein K, Cohen-Solal A, Filippatos G, McMurray JJ, Ponikowski P, Poole-Wilson PA, Stromberg A, van Veldhuisen DJ, Atar D, Hoes AW, Keren A, Mebazaa A, Nieminen M, Priori SG, Swedberg K, Vahanian A, Camm J, De Caterina R, Dean V, Funck-Brentano C, Hellemans I, Kristensen SD, McGregor K, Sechtem U, Silber S, Tendera M, Widimsky P, Zamorano JL: ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Eur Heart J 2008, 29:2388–2442.PubMedView Article
                    4. DeFilippi C, van Kimmenade RR, Pinto YM: Amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide testing in renal disease. Am J Cardiol 2008, 101:82–88.PubMedView Article
                    5. Law C, Glover C, Benson K, Guglin M: Extremely high brain natriuretic peptide does not reflect the severity of heart failure. Congest Heart Fail 2010, 16:221–225.PubMedView Article
                    6. Guglin M, Hourani R, Pitta S: Factors determining extreme brain natriuretic peptide elevation. Congest Heart Fail 2007, 13:136–141.PubMedView Article
                    7. Robinson BE: Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease and anemia. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2006,7(9 Suppl):S3-S6. quiz S17–21PubMedView Article
                    8. Maisel AS, Clopton P, Krishnaswamy P, Nowak RM, McCord J, Hollander JE, Duc P, Omland T, Storrow AB, Abraham WT, Wu AH, Steg G, Westheim A, Knudsen CW, Perez A, Kazanegra R, Bhalla V, Herrmann HC, Aumont MC, McCullough PA: Impact of age, race, and sex on the ability of B-type natriuretic peptide to aid in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure: results from the Breathing Not Properly (BNP) multinational study. Am Heart J 2004, 147:1078–1084.PubMedView Article
                    9. Coresh J, Astor BC, Greene T, Eknoyan G, Levey AS: Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Kidney Dis 2003, 41:1–12.PubMedView Article
                    10. Nitta K, Kawashima A, Yumura W, Naruse M, Oba T, Kabaya T, Nihei H: Plasma concentration of brain natriuretic peptide as an indicator of cardiac ventricular function in patients on hemodialysis. Am J Nephrol 1998, 18:411–415.PubMedView Article
                    11. Yang JW, Kim MS, Kim JS, Yoo JM, Han ST, Kim BR, Kim YD, Choi JW, Choi SO, Han BG: Relationship between serum brain natriuretic peptide and heart function in patients with chronic kidney disease. Korean J Intern Med 2008, 23:191–200.PubMedView Article
                    12. Prnjavorac B, Abduzaimovic K, Jukic J, Sejdinovic R, Mujaric E, Irejiz N, Hadzovic-Dzuvo A, Jadric R, Causevic A, Semiz S, Bego T, Malenica M: Use of amino-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide as the parameter for long-term monitoring of water overload in patient with chronic kidney diseases. Med Glas Ljek komore Zenicko-doboj kantona 2011, 8:116–120.PubMed
                    13. Tang WH, Francis GS, Morrow DA, Newby LK, Cannon CP, Jesse RL, Storrow AB, Christenson RH: National academy of clinical biochemistry laboratory medicine practice guidelines: clinical utilization of cardiac biomarker testing in heart failure. Clin Biochem 2008, 41:210–221.PubMedView Article
                    14. Pemberton CJ, Johnson ML, Yandle TG, Espiner E: Deconvolution analysis of cardiac natriuretic peptides during acute volume overload. Hypertension 2000, 36:355–359.PubMedView Article
                    15. Liang F, O’Rear J, Schellenberger U, Tai L, Lasecki M, Schreiner GF, Apple FS, Maisel AS, Pollitt NS, Protter AA: Evidence for functional heterogeneity of circulating B-type natriuretic peptide. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49:1071–1078.PubMedView Article
                    16. Xu-Cai YO, Wu Q: Molecular forms of natriuretic peptides in heart failure and their implications. Heart 2009, 96:419–424.PubMedView Article
                    17. Rudiger A, Gasser S, Fischler M, Hornemann T, von Eckardstein A, Maggiorini M: Comparable increase of B-type natriuretic peptide and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels in patients with severe sepsis, septic shock, and acute heart failure. Crit Care Med 2006, 34:2140–2144.PubMedView Article
                    18. Doust JA, Pietrzak E, Dobson A, Glasziou P: How well does B-type natriuretic peptide predict death and cardiac events in patients with heart failure: systematic review. BMJ 2005, 330:625.PubMedView Article
                    19. Vaes B, de Ruijter W, Degryse J, Westendorp RG, Gussekloo J: Clinical relevance of a raised plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level in a population-based cohort of nonagenarians. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009, 57:823–829.PubMedView Article
                    20. Bettencourt P, Azevedo A, Pimenta J, Frioes F, Ferreira S, Ferreira A: N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide predicts outcome after hospital discharge in heart failure patients. Circulation 2004, 110:2168–2174.PubMedView Article
                    21. Ogawa T, Veinot JP, Davies RA, Haddad H, Smith SJ, Masters RG, Hendry PJ, Starling R, de Bold MK, Ponce A, Ma KK, Williams K, de Bold AJ: Neuroendocrine profiling of humans receiving cardiac allografts. J Heart Lung Transplant 2005, 24:1046–1054.PubMedView Article
                    22. Crilley JG, Farrer M: Left ventricular remodelling and brain natriuretic peptide after first myocardial infarction. Heart 2001, 86:638–642.PubMedView Article
                    23. Hunt PJ, Yandle TG, Nicholls MG, Richards AM, Espiner EA: The amino-terminal portion of pro-brain natriuretic peptide (Pro-BNP) circulates in human plasma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1995, 214:1175–1183.PubMedView Article
                    24. Hunt PJ, Richards AM, Nicholls MG, Yandle TG, Doughty RN, Espiner EA: Immunoreactive amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT PRO-BNP): a new marker of cardiac impairment. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1997, 47:287–296.View Article
                    25. Melki D, Lind S, Agewall S, Jernberg T: Prognostic value of combining high sensitive troponin T and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide in chest pain patients with no persistent ST-elevation. Clin Chim Acta 2012,413(9–10):933–937.PubMedView Article
                    26. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Rose L, Buring JE, Cook NR: Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 2002, 347:1557–1565.PubMedView Article
                    27. Haverkate F, Thompson SG, Pyke SD, Gallimore JR, Pepys MB: Production of C-reactive protein and risk of coronary events in stable and unstable angina. European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study Group. Lancet 1997, 349:462–466.PubMedView Article
                    28. Kistorp C, Raymond I, Pedersen F, Gustafsson F, Faber J, Hildebrandt P: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, and urinary albumin levels as predictors of mortality and cardiovascular events in older adults. JAMA 2005, 293:1609–1616.PubMedView Article
                    29. Raymond I, Groenning BA, Hildebrandt PR, Nilsson JC, Baumann M, Trawinski J, Pedersen F: The influence of age, sex and other variables on the plasma level of N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide in a large sample of the general population. Heart 2003, 89:745–751.PubMedView Article
                    30. Redfield MM, Rodeheffer RJ, Jacobsen SJ, Mahoney DW, Bailey KR, Burnett JC: Plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentration: impact of age and gender. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002, 40:976–982.PubMedView Article
                    31. Troughton RW, Richards AM, Yandle TG, Frampton CM, Nicholls MG: The effects of medications on circulating levels of cardiac natriuretic peptides. Ann Med 2007, 39:242–260.PubMedView Article
                    32. Pre-publication history

                      1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1471-2261/​12/​57/​prepub

                    Copyright

                    © Cui et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012