Peer Review reports
From: An interesting electrocardiogram caused by lead reversal
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
25 Aug 2023 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Jan 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Javier Cesar Barcos |
5 Jan 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
22 Jan 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Dianzhu Pan |
31 Jan 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Dianzhu Pan |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
22 Jan 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
31 Jan 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Dianzhu Pan |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
31 Jan 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
7 Feb 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
16 Feb 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Javier Cesar Barcos |
3 Mar 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Dianzhu Pan |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Mar 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
9 Mar 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Dianzhu Pan |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
9 Mar 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
16 Mar 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
19 Mar 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Javier Cesar Barcos |
21 Mar 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pedro Brugada |
23 Mar 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Yun-Tao Zhao |
2 Apr 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Dianzhu Pan |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
2 Apr 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
2 Apr 2024 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Apr 2024 | Article published | 10.1186/s12872-024-03875-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.