Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
10 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Fearon |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
10 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
10 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Fearon |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
10 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
19 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kou-Gi Shyu |
1 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martin Unverdorben |
9 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - dimitris Tousoulis |
4 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Fearon |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
5 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Fearon |
5 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - dimitris Tousoulis |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
5 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
10 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kou-Gi Shyu |
21 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Martin Unverdorben |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Publishing | ||
11 Aug 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
17 Sep 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2261-12-75 |
You can find further information about peer review here.