Skip to main content

Incidence and risk factors associated with atrioventricular block in the general population: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study and Cardiovascular Health Study

Abstract

Objectives

To identify risk factors correlated with atrioventricular block (AVB) in the general population.

Methods

Participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study (ARIC) and the Cardiovascular Health study (CHS) were enrolled. The presence of AVB was confirmed at an electrocardiogram (ECG) reading center using Minnesota ECG Classification. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to investigate potential risk factors of AVB, after adjustment for age, sex, race and traditional cardiovascular risk factors.

Results

During the 17 years of follow-up, a total of 731 high-degree AVB cases were identified. Age and sex-standardized rate of AVB was 2.79 and 2.35 per 1000 person-years in the white and the black population, respectively. With the increase of the geriatric population, the incidence of high-degree AVB will increase from 378,816 in 2020 to 535,076 in 2060, and most increment would occur among the elderly. Older age, male sex, the white race, overweight, comorbidities, declined forced vital capacity (FVC), elevated inflammation biomarkers, left bundle branch block and bifascicular block were independently associated with the incidence of high-degree AVB.

Conclusion

To conclude, older age, male sex, white population, overweight, combined diabetes or chronic kidney disease, impaired FVC, elevated inflammation biomarkers, left bundle branch block and bifascicular block were independent predictors for high-degree AVB. The next 40 years would witness a dramatic increase in the incidence of high-degree AVB.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Atrioventricular block (AVB) is a common conduction system disorder, characterized by the delay or interruption in the transmission of an impulse from the atrium to the ventricle. According to previous studies, high grade AVB, including second-degree Mobitz type II AVB and third-degree AVB, was associated with severe bradycardia and hemodynamic instability, which might result in higher risk of syncope, asystole, ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death, thus requiring the implantation of permanent pacemaker [1].

Common causes for AVB include the age-related fibrosis and degeneration of the cardiac conduction system, coronary artery disease, cardiomyopathy, congenital heart diseases, autoimmune disorders, previously received cardiac surgery such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement, ventricular septal defect repair or valve replacement and atrioventricular-nodal blocking agents application. Nevertheless, in a large majority of young patients, the aetiology of AVB remained unknown [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Additionally, most previous studies concerning AVB risk factors focused on particular population with underlying diseases, thus could not be extrapolated to the general population. Thus, the potential mechanisms and modifiable risk factors for AVB in the general population warrant further study.

The aim of this study was to identify risk factors correlated with the occurrence of AVB in a large-scale general population, thus providing potential therapeutic targets in the early prevention and treatment of AVB.

Methods

Enrolled population

Participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study (ARIC) and the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) were enrolled, with an average follow-up of 17 years. The ARIC study is a population-based prospective cohort which enrolled Caucasian and African-American participants aged 45 to 64 years at baseline(Visit 1, 1987–1989) and free of prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD) from 4 U.S communities, and focused on the etiology, clinical sequelae and risk factors of atherosclerosis [8]. The CHS study is a population-based longitudinal study which recruited participants aged 65 years or older at baseline (Visit 1, 1989–1990, original cohort and visit 2, 1992–1993, supplemental cohort) from 4 U.S communities, in order to identify risk factors linked to the prevalence and natural history of coronary heart disease, stroke and other cardiovascular diseases [9]. Participants were excluded from the current study if they had incomplete baseline data, missed or poor electrocardiographic (ECG) data, if they had second degree AVB or complete AVB or atrial or ventricular pacing at baseline (Fig. 1). Details concerning design, eligibility criteria and procedures of the ARIC and CHS study have been reported [8,9,10].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of study participants ARIC indicates Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities; AVB, atrioventricular block; CHS: Cardiovascular Health study; ECG: electrocardiogram

We chose these cohorts because they were designed to investigate risk factors and natural history of cardiovascular diseases in the general population, and their methodology for the ascertainment of AVB was rigorous, comparable, and validated [11]. Furthermore, these enrolled communities varied in terms of education, income level, urbanization and medical care. Both studies were approved by the institutional review boards at all participating institution, and all participants provided written informed consent at enrollment.

Clinical features

Demographic characteristics including age, sex, race and body mass index, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, co-morbidities, lab parameters such as estimated GFR, renal function, lung function and ECG variables were obtained through self-report, physical examination and blood tests during baseline study visit, while several cardiac biomarkers and thyroid function parameters were measured at later visits. In ARIC study, plasma concentration of Troponin T and N-terminal pronatriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were measured between 2010 and 2011 using blood samples collected at visit 4(1996–1997), and also measured at visit 5 (2012–2013). Between 2010 and 2011, ARIC investigators measured plasma concentrations of hs-cTnT and NTproBNP using blood samples that were collected at visit 4(1996–1998) and stored at 70 ℃ until the assay was performed. Thyroid function parameters such as thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), total triiodothyronine (TT3) and free thyroxin (FT4) were measured at study visit 5. In CHS study, NT-proBNP were measured between 2007 and 2008, while Troponin T concentrations and thyroid parameters were analyzed in 2010.

Current smoking status and alcohol drinking were ascertained according to their questionnaires. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure more than or equal to 140mmHg, or diastolic blood pressure more than or equal to 90mmHg, or reported the use of antihypertensive medications. The diagnosis of diabetes was ascertained when the participant meets one of the following: the fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL, 2-hour glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL, with an A1C value of more than or equal to 6.5%, or use of oral antidiabetic agents or insulin [12]. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using cystatin C based CDK-EPI equation, and chronic kidney disease was defined as eGFR less than 60mL/min/1.73 m² or the presence of proteinuria.

Identification of AVB

In both CHS and ARIC study, ECG recordings were performed during each study visits and further analyzed at an ECG reading center. Presence of AVB was identified using Minnesota ECG Classification standard. Mobitz type II second degree AVB (Minnesota code 6.2.1) was characterized as the occurrence of intermittent non-conducted P waves, with constant PR intervals, while complete AVB (Minnesota code 6.1) was defined as the absence of AV nodal conduction, with independent P waves and unrelated QRS complexes. High-degree AVB was described as the presence of Mobitz type II second degree AVB or complete AVB. The incidence of AVB was taken into consideration when the medical records included the diagnosis of AVB, symptoms and consistent ECG characteristics.

ECG parameters

12-lead ECG of each participant were performed during every scheduled visit and then read centrally using the Minnesota ECG Classification, and those with missing lead or technical errors were excluded. ECG parameters including the heart rate, PR interval, QRS interval and QTc interval were analyzed at an ECG read center. Furthermore, other conduction disorders including right bundle branch block (RBBB), left bundle branch block (LBBB) and bifascicular block were also confirmed.

Statistical analysis

Clinical characteristics of the enrolled population were compared between the white and the black population. Continuous variables were expressed as mean (SD) or median (range), while categorical variables were described as frequency and percentage. One-way ANOVA test or Nonparametric Kruskal Walls test was used to make comparisons for continuous variables, while Chi-square or Fisher exact-test were applied for categorical variables. The annual incidence of AVB occurring in the U.S. population older than 45 years of age during 2020 to 2060 was estimated, by applying age-specific incidence rates from the ARIC and CHS cohorts to the U.S. Census Bureau population projections [13] through 2060, on condition that no other risk factors would affect the distribution of AVB incidence in different age groups. To illustrate the potential impact of race and sex on the incidence of AVB, age and sex standardized incidence rate of AVB was calculated among the white and the black population, then age and race standardized rate was also calculated in both sexes.

In order to identify potential risk factors of high-degree AVB and complete AVB, Cox proportional hazards models were applied to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) after adjustment for age, sex, race and traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Variables such as age, sex, BMI, lipid profiles, renal function, lung function, inflammation biomarkers, thyroid function, ECG features and cardiac biomarkers were analyzed using a stepwise backward process. Missing values on all socio-demographic covariates were handled by Markov Chain Monte Carlo multiple imputation method before their inclusion in the full adjusted models. All analysis was performed using Stata 15.0 (College Station, TX). A 2-tailed p-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant for all analysis executed.

Results

Clinical features of the enrolled population

A total of 18,547 participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study (ARIC, n = 13125) and the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS, n = 5422) were enrolled, with an average follow-up of 17 years. Clinical features of these participants were shown in Table 1. The average age was 59.8 years, and males consisted 45.32% of the whole population. In comparison to ARIC participants, population in CHS was older, with higher incidence of coronary artery disease, stroke, chronic kidney disease and left bundle branch block, while the incidence of hypertension, smoking history and forced vital capacity was lower.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics in the enrolled population

Furthermore, the black population exhibited a higher prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, stroke, chronic kidney disease, overweight and smoking history, while the white population were with higher incidence of coronary artery disease and more alcohol consumption. Regarding laboratory parameters, lower level of HDL-cholesterol, eGFR, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), NT-proBNP and Troponin T, as well as higher forced vital capacity (FVC), TSH, FT4 and TT3 were observed in the white population. Additionally, ECG features varied between both races. Shorter PR interval and prolonged QRS interval, lower incidence of LBBB and higher prevalence of bifascicular block were observed in the white, when compared with the black population.

Estimated incidence of high-degree AVB

During the 17 years of follow-up, a total of 731 high-degree AVB cases were identified. According to Table 2, the incidence of AVB increased significantly with age in both races (Table 2). In the whole population, the age and sex-standardized rate of AVB was 2.79 per 1000 person-years in the white, and 2.35 per 1000 person-years in the black population. Likewise, age and race-standardized rate of AVB was 3.73 per 1000 person-years in males and 1.93 per 1000 person-years in females.

Table 2 Estimated incidence of AVB in different sex and races

As shown in Fig. 2, it was estimated that the incidence of high-degree AVB would be 378,816 per year in 2020 (95%CI: 353562–408280), and it might increase to approximately 535,076 per year by 2060 (95%CI: 499404–576693). Most increment would occur among the elderly population, especially in those aged more than 75 years.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Estimated incidence of high-degree AVB from 2020 to 2060 The incidence of high-degree AVB would be 378,816 per year in 2020 (95%CI: 353562–408280), and it might increase to approximately 535,076 per year by 2060 (95%CI: 499404–576693). The shaded area represents the range of 95% confidence intervals for the estimated incidence of high-degree AVB

Risk factors associated with high-degree AVB

As shown in Fig. 3, a total of 731 high-degree AVB cases (including 556 complete AVB patients) were diagnosed during the follow-up of 17 years. Above all, older age (HR per 10-year increment 2.23, 95% CI 2.04–2.44), male sex (HR 1.74, 95%CI 1.46–2.06), white race (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.04–1.57), overweight (HR 1.36, 95%CI 1.12–1.63), obese (HR 1.49, 95%CI 1.20–1.84), combined with diabetes (HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.05–1.25), occurrence of cardiovascular events (HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.29–1.84), impaired forced vital capacity (HR for FVC < 2.81 L 1.74, 95%CI 1.28–2.37, HR for 2.81 L ≤ FVC < 3.44 L 1.48, 95%CI 1.14–1.92) were associated with AVB. Furthermore, chronic kidney disease (HR 1.37, 95%CI 1.04–1.80) was also correlated with the increased incidence of AVB. It was estimated that a 10mL/min decrease in eGFR might result in 6% increased risk in AVB (HR 1.06, 95%CI 1.01–1.11), and a 2-fold increase in cystatin C was associated with 30% increased risk of AVB (HR 1.33, 95%CI 1.03–1.71). Likewise, inflammation biomarkers CRP (HR 1.07, 95%CI 1.01–1.13) and IL-6 (HR 1.16, 95%CI 1.01–1.32), cardiac injury biomarkers such as NT-proBNP (HR 1.11, 95%CI 1.05–1.18) and Troponin T (HR 1.30, 95%CI 1.13–1.49) were also associated with AVB. In terms of other conduction system disorders, prolonged PR interval (HR per 30ms increment 1.24, 95%CI 1.16–1.33), QRS interval (HR per 15 ms increase 1.38, 95%CI 1.31–1.46), QTc interval (HR per 40ms increment 1.14, 95%CI 1.02–1.26), left bundle branch block (HR 1.91, 95%CI 1.51–2.42), bifascicular block (HR 2.83, 95%CI 1.34–5.98) were independently associated with high-degree AVB.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Risk factors independently associated with complete AVB and high-degree AVB According to multivariate Cox regression analysis, older age, male sex, white race, overweight, combined with diabetes, impaired FVC, elevated inflammation biomarkers, other conduction disorders including LBBB and bifascicular block were independent predictors of complete AVB or high-degree AVB LDL-cholesterol indicates low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; CV event, cardiovascular event; BMI, body mass index; CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FVC, forced vital capacity; CRP, C-reactive protein; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; TT3, total triiodothyronine; FT4, free thyroxin; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pronatriuretic peptide

Discussion

In this study, we found that the incidence of AVB increased significantly with age in both the black and the white population. The year 2020 to 2060 would witness a dramatic increase in the occurrence of high-degree AVB, and most increment would occur among the elderly, especially in those aged more than 75 years. Furthermore, older age, male sex, white race, overweight, combined with diabetes, declined forced vital capacity, elevated inflammation biomarkers or cardiac injury biomarkers were confirmed to be correlated with the incidence of high-degree AVB or complete AVB. The prolongation of the PR interval, QRS interval and QTc interval might slightly increase the risk of AVB. In addition, conduction disorders such as left bundle branch block and bifascicular block were associated with higher incidence of AVB (Figure 4). Nevertheless, it’s crucial to note that further research is required to establish any causal relationships and determine if improved management of these risk factors may potentially contribute to a lower incidence of high-degree AVB.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Central illustration. Demographic characteristics, such as older age, male sex and white race, cardiovascular risk factors (obesity, diabetes, impaired lung function, chronic kidney disease) may affect the conductive system and promote the pathological changes. Variables in the electrocardiogram (ECG) and blood tests could be used to characterize the conductive disorder. Eventually, alterations in the conductive system lead to signs and symptoms of AVB, thus resulting in a clinical diagnosis of AVB. CV indicates cardiovascular; CRP, C-reactive protein; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pronatriuretic peptide; IL-6, interleukin-6; AVB, atrioventricular block

As far as we know, most previous studies concerning AVB risk factors focused on specific population such as patients undergoing congenital heart surgery, transcatheter aortic valve replacement or percutaneous coronary intervention, thus could not be extrapolated to the general population. Only a few population-based studies focusing on AVB risk factors have been conducted. In Kerola et al. study [14], which enrolled 6146 community-dwelling individuals, older age, male sex, history of myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure, increasing blood pressure and fast glucose level were independently related to AVB. In Shan R et al. study, the prevalence and risk factors of AVB among large-scale Chinese health examination adults were evaluated. Similarly, older age, male gender and several metabolic factors were correlated with the incidence of AVB [15]. The HORIZON-AMI trial [6] enrolled patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and it was revealed that older age, diabetes mellitus, right coronary artery occlusion and baseline thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow 0/1 were independently associated with high-grade AVB. In Pollari et al. study [3], risk factors correlated with AVB and permanent pacemaker implantation included baseline right bundle branch block, overweight, previous PCI and left ventricular outflow tract calcification. In patients received congenital heart surgery [2], especially in those received congenitally-corrected TGA repair, ventricular septal defect repair, tricuspid valve replacement or Nikaidoh procedure, the prolongation of cardiopulmonary bypass was independently associated with AVB.

Older age is a crucial risk factor in AVB occurrence, which might be partially explained by age-related conduction system fibrosis. In our study, a 10-year increment in age resulted in more than 2-fold risk increase in complete AVB or high-degree AVB. Thus, with the rapid increase in the geriatric population, the incidence of AVB would rise significantly, which might exert much burden on global health. Although permanent pacemaker implantation has been regarded as an effective treatment choice for high-degree AVB, complications such as bleeding, pneumothorax, lead failure, pacemaker dysfunction or battery depletion at early stage, pacemaker migration, erosion, pace system related endocarditis could not be ignored [16], and the risk of pacemaker implantation related infection remained higher in the elderly despite of antibiotics use prior to surgery [17]. According to our study, particular attention should be paid to the elderly patients, especially those aged more than 75 years, and patients with renal insufficiency. Regular ECG or 24-hour holter monitoring might be useful for early detection of high-degree AVB, and timely intervention might improve their prognosis and life quality, as well as reduce mortality.

In our study, impaired renal function, characterized as declined eGFR and increased cystatin C, was independently associated with high-degree AVB. It was universally acknowledged that cardiovascular disease has become the leading cause of death in patients with chronic kidney disease. Furthermore, about 25 to 30% sudden cardiac death in patients receiving dialysis was caused by arrhythmia [18]. In a study which enrolled 923 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [19], the correlation between declined eGFR and risk of cardiac conduction defects was reported. In patients with eGFR less than 30 ml/min/1.73 m², the risk of cardiac conduction disorders such as atrioventricular block, LBBB, RBBB and left anterior hemi-block reached almost 3.6 folds after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors.

In recent years, the link between lung function and cardiovascular diseases has aroused much concern. Our study added the evidence that impaired FVC were independently associated with complete AVB or high-degree AVB. Previous studies have demonstrated that abnormal FVC, forced expiratory volume in 1s(FEV1) and FEV1/FVC ratio might be correlated with a higher incidence of cardiovascular diseases [20, 21]. In Waheed et al. study [22], impaired pulmonary function significantly increased the risk of heart failure and cardiovascular mortality in the elderly population with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Declined FEV1 was also correlated with higher atrial fibrillation incidence, according to an analysis in 15,004 participants from the ARIC study [23]. Nevertheless, current research is insufficient to establish a causal relationship. Possible explanations were the triggered inflammatory state originated from smoking, air pollution or infection, which linked pulmonary function and cardiac dysfunction.

Chronic inflammatory state, often defined as the elevation in systemic cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, CRP and TNF-a, has been regarded as a crucial contributor for cardiovascular disease for a long time. In our study, overweight or obese, in combination with diabetes, elevated systemic inflammation biomarkers IL-6 and CRP were associated with higher incidence of AVB. Previous studies have illustrated that impaired energy homeostasis were observed in overweight patients and those with diabetes, which participated in the development of metabolic inflammation [24, 25]. Inflammatory state played crucial roles in the activation of leukocytes, endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells, then participating in the process of atherosclerosis and inducing plaque destabilization [25,26,27]. Our study indicated that inflammation was also linked to complete AVB or high-degree AVB, but the potential mechanisms warrant further study.

ECG characteristics might also provide hints for the potential risk of AVB. In our study, left bundle branch block and bifascicular block were independently associated with AVB, while no significant correlation was observed between RBBB and AVB. According to previous studies, left bundle branch block was associated with higher risk of heart failure and myocardial infarction, thus presenting poorer cardiovascular prognosis and higher mortality. In contrast, right bundle branch block, despite of the relatively higher incidence, was with conflicting results [28]. In the Copenhagen City Heart Study [29], RBBB was associated with increased risk or myocardial infarction and pacemaker implantation, but no significant correlation was observed between RBBB and chronic heart failure. In Meyer et al. study [30], higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and death during hospitalization was shown in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with LBBB, when compared with those with RBBB. Previous studies in patients received transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) demonstrated that patients with preexisting LBBB or BBB had a higher risk of developing high-degree AVB and requiring pacemaker implantation [31, 32].

This study has several advantages. On one hand, while most previous studies were small and focused on particular population, our study added valuable evidence regarding AVB risk factors in a large-scale general population. On the other hand, early identification of risk factors might provide potential therapeutic targets for the prevention and treatment of AVB, thus improving the clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, there is no doubt that a few limitations existed. This study enrolled only the white and the black population, therefore, these findings could not be extrapolated to other ethnic groups. Furthermore, since the participants of the ARIC and CHS study were drawn from several U.S communities, the estimated trend of AVB and potential risk factors might not represent the entire population. In addition, these studies didn’t provide data on drug treatment during follow-up, which might be correlated with the incidence of AVB.

To conclude, older age, male sex, white population, overweight, combined with diabetes or chronic kidney disease, impaired FVC, elevated inflammation biomarkers, other conduction system disorders including left bundle branch block and bifascicular block were independent predictors for high-degree AVB. The next 40 years would witness a dramatic increase of the incidence of high-degree AVB.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the BioLINCC website (https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/) on reasonable application.

Abbreviations

AVB:

atrioventricular block

ARIC:

Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study

CHS:

Cardiovascular Health study

ECG:

electrocardiogram

FVC:

forced vital capacity

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

RBBB:

right bundle branch block

LBBB:

left bundle branch block

CRP:

C-reactive protein

IL-6:

interleukin-6

TAVR:

transcatheter aortic valve replacement

References

  1. Aste M, Brignole M. Syncope and paroxysmal atrioventricular block. J Arrhythm. 2017;33:562–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Romer AJ, Tabbutt S, Etheridge SP, Fischbach P, Ghanayem NS, Reddy VM, Sahulee R, Tanel RE, Tweddell JS, Gaies M, Banerjee M, Retzloff L, Zhang W, Patel AR. Atrioventricular block after congenital heart surgery: analysis from the Pediatric Cardiac critical Care Consortium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157:1168–77.e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pollari F, Grossmann I, Vogt F, Kalisnik JM, Cuomo M, Schwab J, Fischlein T, Pfeiffer S. Risk factors for atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a single-centre analysis including assessment of aortic calcifications and follow-up. Europace. 2019;21:787–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aguiar Rosa S, Timoteo AT, Ferreira L, Carvalho R, Oliveira M, Cunha P, Viveiros Monteiro A, Portugal G, Almeida Morais L, Daniel P, Cruz Ferreira R. Complete atrioventricular block in acute coronary syndrome: prevalence, characterisation and implication on outcome. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc care. 2018;7:218–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barra SN, Providencia R, Paiva L, Nascimento J, Marques AL. A review on advanced atrioventricular block in young or middle-aged adults. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol: PACE. 2012;35:1395–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kosmidou I, Redfors B, Dordi R, Dizon JM, McAndrew T, Mehran R, Ben-Yehuda O, Mintz GS, Stone GW. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of high-Grade Atrioventricular Block in patients with ST-Segment Elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the HORIZONS-AMI Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2017;119:1295–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rudbeck-Resdal J, Christiansen MK, Johansen JB, Nielsen JC, Bundgaard H, Jensen HK. Aetiologies and temporal trends of atrioventricular block in young patients: a 20-year nationwide study. Europace. 2019;21:1710–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Investigators TA. The atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study: design and objectives. The ARIC investigators. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129:687–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fried LP, Borhani NO, Enright P, Furberg CD, Gardin JM, Kronmal RA, Kuller LH, Manolio TA, Mittelmark MB, Newman A. The Cardiovascular Health Study: design and rationale. Ann Epidemiol. 1991;1:263–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tell GS, Fried LP, Hermanson B, Manolio TA, Newman AB, Borhani NO. Recruitment of adults 65 years and older as participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Ann Epidemiol. 1993;3:358–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Waks JW, Sitlani CM, Soliman EZ, Kabir M, Ghafoori E, Biggs ML, Henrikson CA, Sotoodehnia N, Biering-Sorensen T, Agarwal SK, Siscovick DS, Post WS, Solomon SD, Buxton AE, Josephson ME, Tereshchenko LG. Global Electric Heterogeneity Risk score for prediction of Sudden Cardiac Death in the General Population: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) and Cardiovascular Health (CHS) studies. Circulation. 2016;133:2222–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fox CS, Golden SH, Anderson C, Bray GA, Burke LE, de Boer IH, Deedwania P, Eckel RH, Ershow AG, Fradkin J, Inzucchi SE, Kosiborod M, Nelson RG, Patel MJ, Pignone M, Quinn L, Schauer PR, Selvin E, Vafiadis DK, American Heart Association Diabetes Committee of the Council on L, Cardiometabolic H, Council on Clinical Cardiology CoC, Stroke Nursing CoCS, Anesthesia CoQoC, Outcomes R and American Diabetes A. Update on prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in light of recent evidence: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:1777–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Population Division U.S. Census Bureau. National Population Projections. Washington DC: Government Printing Office; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kerola T, Eranti A, Aro AL, Haukilahti MA, Holkeri A, Junttila MJ, Kentta TV, Rissanen H, Vittinghoff E, Knekt P, Heliovaara M, Huikuri HV, Marcus GM. Risk factors associated with atrioventricular block. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e194176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Shan R, Ning Y, Ma Y, Liu S, Wu J, Fan X, Lv J, Wang B, Li S, Li L. Prevalence and risk factors of atrioventricular block among 15 million Chinese health examination participants in 2018: a nation-wide cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021;21:289.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Opic P, van Kranenburg M, Yap SC, van Dijk AP, Budts W, Vliegen HW, van Erven L, Can A, Sahin G, Theuns DA, Witsenburg M, Roos-Hesselink JW. Complications of pacemaker therapy in adults with congenital heart disease: a multicenter study. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:3212–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin Y, Li ZZ, Zhang J, Zhang J, Fan Q, Du J. Aging might increase the incidence of infection from permanent pacemaker implantation. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2013;2013:943416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wong MC, Kalman JM, Pedagogos E, Toussaint N, Vohra JK, Sparks PB, Sanders P, Kistler PM, Halloran K, Lee G, Joseph SA, Morton JB. Temporal distribution of arrhythmic events in chronic kidney disease: highest incidence in the long interdialytic period. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:2047–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mantovani A, Rigolon R, Turino T, Pichiri I, Falceri A, Rossi A, Temporelli PL, Bonapace S, Lippi G, Zoppini G, Bonora E, Byrne CD, Targher G. Association between decreasing estimated glomerular filtration rate and risk of cardiac conduction defects in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2018;44:473–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramalho SHR, Shah AM. Lung function and cardiovascular disease: A link. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2021;31:93–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Silvestre OM, Nadruz W Jr, Querejeta Roca G, Claggett B, Solomon SD, Mirabelli MC, London SJ, Loehr LR, Shah AM. Declining lung function and cardiovascular risk: the ARIC study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:1109–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Waheed S, Chaves PH, Gardin JM, Cao JJ. Cardiovascular and Mortality outcomes in the Elderly with impaired cardiac and pulmonary function: the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS). J Am Heart Association. 2015;4:e002308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li J, Agarwal SK, Alonso A, Blecker S, Chamberlain AM, London SJ, Loehr LR, McNeill AM, Poole C, Soliman EZ, Heiss G. Airflow obstruction, lung function, and incidence of atrial fibrillation: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Circulation. 2014;129:971–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saltiel AR, Olefsky JM. Inflammatory mechanisms linking obesity and metabolic disease. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:1–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lehrskov LL, Christensen RH. The role of interleukin-6 in glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism. Semin Immunopathol. 2019;41:491–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liberale L, Montecucco F, Tardif JC, Libby P, Camici GG. Inflamm-ageing: the role of inflammation in age-dependent cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:2974.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lawler PR, Bhatt DL, Godoy LC, Luscher TF, Bonow RO, Verma S, Ridker PM. Targeting cardiovascular inflammation: next steps in clinical translation. Eur Heart J. 2020;42:113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sridhar AR, Padala SK. Isolated right bundle branch block in asymptomatic patients: not inconsequential as previously thought? Heart. 2019;105:1136–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bussink BE, Holst AG, Jespersen L, Deckers JW, Jensen GB, Prescott E. Right bundle branch block: prevalence, risk factors, and outcome in the general population: results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:138–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Meyer MR, Radovanovic D, Pedrazzini G, Rickli H, Roffi M, Rosemann T, Eberli FR, Kurz DJ. Differences in presentation and clinical outcomes between left or right bundle branch block and ST segment elevation in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc care. 2020;9:848 2048872620905101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Knecht S, Schaer B, Reichlin T, Spies F, Madaffari A, Vischer A, Fahrni G, Jeger R, Kaiser C, Osswald S. Sticherling C and Kuhne M. Electrophysiology Testing to stratify patients with left Bundle Branch Block after Transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Heart Association. 2020;9:e014446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Urena M, Mok M, Serra V, Dumont E, Nombela-Franco L, DeLarochelliere R, Doyle D, Igual A, Larose E, Amat-Santos I, Cote M, Cuellar H, Pibarot P, de Jaegere P, Philippon F, Garcia del Blanco B, Rodes-Cabau J. Predictive factors and long-term clinical consequences of persistent left bundle branch block following transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable valve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1743–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staff and participants of the ARIC study, the CHS study, and BioLINCC for their important contributions.

Funding

The ARIC study and CHS study are carried out as collaborative studies supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute contracts. The study was financially supported by the grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (82270333), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2024A1515013067), the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China (2024B03J1344), and High-level Talents Introduction Plan of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (KY012023007).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr Cheng YJ conceived this study and had full access to all the data in this study. Dr Cheng YJ and Dr Yao FJ contributed to the design of the study, and provided guidance during the whole process. Dr Zhang JW contributed to the data analysis and interpretation, and wrote the main manuscript. Dr Liu J, Dr Ye M and Dr Zhang M contributed to the data analysis and interpretation. All authors have reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fengjuan Yao or Yunjiu Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ARIC study and CHS study included in this investigation has already received ethical approval from an individual institutional review board, and all participants provided written informed consent. As our research has been conducted using publicly available datasets and used de-identified data, no additional ethical approval was required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Liu, J., Ye, M. et al. Incidence and risk factors associated with atrioventricular block in the general population: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study and Cardiovascular Health Study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 24, 509 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04163-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04163-9

Keywords