Skip to main content

Table 1 Discrete event simulation model parameters

From: Electrophysiology lab efficiency comparison between cryoballoon and point-by-point radiofrequency ablation: a German sub-analysis of the FREEZE Cohort study

Parameter in the DES model

Value

Lab occupancy time distribution*

 

 CBA procedure time distribution

122.0 ± 39.0 min (FREEZE Cohort)

 RFA procedure time distribution

160.0 ± 54.6 min (FREEZE Cohort)

 Non-procedural time

38.3 ± 26.5 min (FAST PVI)

Room turnover time

20 min

Lab scheduling method

Fully-flexible scheduling: each procedure starts as soon as the lab opens or as soon as the previous case is over

Dedicated PVI case lab days

3 preplanned cases (PVI)

Shift begin time

7:00 am

First PVI scheduled time

7:30 am

Overtime start time

6:00 pm

Electrophysiologist delay

No delay (dedicated to lab)

Patient operational delay

20–30 min (5% of the time)

  1. CBA, cryoballoon ablation; RFA, irrigated point-by-point radiofrequency ablation; PVI, pulmonary vein isolation
  2. *The time distribution values have been provided in this table with mean ± standard deviation. Distributions of procedure times are available in the Additional file 1