Skip to main content

Table 3 Left ventricular outcomes versus PDM/DM: Adjusted Model #1 (Reference = No PDM/DM)

From: Glycemic status, non-traditional risk and left ventricular structure and function in the Jackson Heart Study

Left Ventricular Measures

Prediabetes

Sig

Diabetes

Sig

n

Mean difference

Percent parameter difference (95% CI)

Mean difference

Percent parameter difference (95% CI)

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (%)

0.39

0.64 (− 0.59,1.88)

0.308

0.13

0.21 (− 1.20,1.64)

0.767

2,234

Left Ventricular Fractional Shortening (%)

− 0.61

− 1.57 (− 3.56,0.46)

0.494

− 0.08

0.22 (− 2.58,2.20)

0.859

1,600

Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (ml/m2)

− 1.43

− 2.65 (− 4.49, − 0.78)

0.006

− 1.44

− 2.66 (− 4.89, − 0.27)

0.015

2,234

Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (ml/m2)

− 0.59

− 3.59 (− 6.73, − 0.34)

0.031

− 0.60

− 3.67 (7.23,—0.02)

0.051

2,234

Stroke Volume Index (ml/m2)

− 0.80

− 2.18 (− 4.21, − 0.12)

0.017

− 0.96

− 2.61 (− 4.89, − 0.27)

0.029

2,234

Cardiac Index (L/min/m2)

− 0.06

− 2.32 (− 4.62,0.03)

0.053

0.14

6.03 (3.20,8.93)

 < 0.001

2,234

Myocardial Contraction Fraction (%)

− 0.40

− 0.74 (− 2.91,1.49)

0.513

− 1.90

− 3.43 (− 5.84, − 0.95)

0.007

2,234

Left Ventricular Mass Index (g/m2)

− 0.11

− 0.16 (− 1.99,2.33)

0.891

2.29

3.31 (0.81,5.89)

0.009

2,234

Relative Wall Thickness (cm)

0.01

1.45 (− 0.03,3.25)

0.107

0.01

3.13 (1.11, 5.25)

0.002

2,234

  1. Each row represents a separate model for Left ventricular outcomes and were adjusted for Hypertension age, gender, physical activity, highest level of education, nutrition pattern, dyslipidemia smoking status, alcohol use, use of crack or cocaine, beta blocker, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, Angiotensin Receptor Blocker. Only LVEF, LV FS, MCF and RWT which were additionally controlled for log of BMI