Skip to main content

Table 3 Left ventricular outcomes versus PDM/DM: Adjusted Model #1 (Reference = No PDM/DM)

From: Glycemic status, non-traditional risk and left ventricular structure and function in the Jackson Heart Study

Left Ventricular Measures Prediabetes Sig Diabetes Sig n
Mean difference Percent parameter difference (95% CI) Mean difference Percent parameter difference (95% CI)
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (%) 0.39 0.64 (− 0.59,1.88) 0.308 0.13 0.21 (− 1.20,1.64) 0.767 2,234
Left Ventricular Fractional Shortening (%) − 0.61 − 1.57 (− 3.56,0.46) 0.494 − 0.08 0.22 (− 2.58,2.20) 0.859 1,600
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (ml/m2) − 1.43 − 2.65 (− 4.49, − 0.78) 0.006 − 1.44 − 2.66 (− 4.89, − 0.27) 0.015 2,234
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (ml/m2) − 0.59 − 3.59 (− 6.73, − 0.34) 0.031 − 0.60 − 3.67 (7.23,—0.02) 0.051 2,234
Stroke Volume Index (ml/m2) − 0.80 − 2.18 (− 4.21, − 0.12) 0.017 − 0.96 − 2.61 (− 4.89, − 0.27) 0.029 2,234
Cardiac Index (L/min/m2) − 0.06 − 2.32 (− 4.62,0.03) 0.053 0.14 6.03 (3.20,8.93)  < 0.001 2,234
Myocardial Contraction Fraction (%) − 0.40 − 0.74 (− 2.91,1.49) 0.513 − 1.90 − 3.43 (− 5.84, − 0.95) 0.007 2,234
Left Ventricular Mass Index (g/m2) − 0.11 − 0.16 (− 1.99,2.33) 0.891 2.29 3.31 (0.81,5.89) 0.009 2,234
Relative Wall Thickness (cm) 0.01 1.45 (− 0.03,3.25) 0.107 0.01 3.13 (1.11, 5.25) 0.002 2,234
  1. Each row represents a separate model for Left ventricular outcomes and were adjusted for Hypertension age, gender, physical activity, highest level of education, nutrition pattern, dyslipidemia smoking status, alcohol use, use of crack or cocaine, beta blocker, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, Angiotensin Receptor Blocker. Only LVEF, LV FS, MCF and RWT which were additionally controlled for log of BMI