Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate analysis comparing factors for good and poor adherence in participants with RHD

From: Secondary prevention of rheumatic heart disease in Ethiopia: a multicenter study

Variables

Number (n)

Adherence

P value

Good

Poor

Age at enrollment (mean, CI)

337

12.8 (12.5, 13.1)

13.4 (12.6, 14.0)

0.184

Sex

Females (n = 182)

160 (87%)

22 (12%)

0.033

Males (n = 155)

123 (79%)

32 (21%)

Family size (mean, CI)

337

6.4 (6.2, 6.7)

5.9 (5.4, 6.5)

0.128

Monthly income in U.S dollars (mean, CI)

337

68.2 ± (60.0, 76.3)

58.9 (42.1, 75.6)

0.352

Residence

Rural (n = 209)

171 (82%)

38 (18%)

0.167

Urban (n = 128)

112 (88%)

16 (12%)

Distance from cardiology clinic in kilometers (mean, CI)

337

155.7 (137.0, 174.5)

149 (101.9,196.5)

0.783

Parental education (at least primary school)

Yes (n = 188)

163 (87%)

25 (15%)

0.125

No (n = 149)

120 (81%)

29 (19%)

Farmers

Yes (n = 168)

146 (87%)

22 (13%)

0.144

No (n = 169)

137 (81%)

32 (19%)

Disease severity

Severe (n = 247)

206 (83%)

41 (17%)

0.630

Mild to moderate (n = 90)

77 (86%)

13 (14%)

Prophylaxis

BPG (n = 272)

234 (86%)

38 (14%)

0.036

Amoxicillin (n = 65)

49 (75.4%)

16 (24.6%)

Duration of prophylaxis (months)

337

48.5 ± 31.5

60.7 ± 33

0.008

  1. The bold was to show significance