Table 2 Comparison of diagnostic performance of AccuiFRct to Predict FFR or iFR
| Â | FFR as reference | iFR as reference |
|---|---|---|
True positive | 11 | 11 |
True negative | 17 | 18 |
False positive | 4 | 3 |
False negative | 4 | 4 |
Sensitivity, % | 73% (44.83–91.09) | 73% (44.83–91.09) |
Specificity, % | 81% (57.42–93.71) | 86% (62.64–96.24) |
PPV, % | 73% (44.83–91.09) | 79% (48.82–94.29) |
NPV, % | 81% (57.42–93.71) | 82% (58.99–94.01) |
Diagnostic accuracy, % | 78% (47.62–89.54) | 81% (51.68–93.16) |
AUC | 0.87 (0.71–0.96) | 0.89 (0.74–0.97) |