Skip to main content

Table 5 Multinomial regression of treatment choice of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or both PCI and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared to CABG as the reference group

From: Cardiology providers’ recommendations for treatments and use of patient decision aids for multivessel coronary artery disease

 

Univariate Model

Full Model

CABG (ref)

PCI

Both

PCI

Both

 

RR

(95% CI)

RR

(95% CI)

RR

(95% CI)

RR

(95% CI)

Vignette

        

 Smith

1

ref

1

ref

1

ref

1

ref

 Adams

9.97

(3.75, 26.49)

2.95

(1.29, 6.73)

11.13

(3.96, 31.28)

3.23

(1.23, 8.46)

 Jones

1.81

(0.93, 3.52)

1.38

(0.90, 2.13)

1.97

(0.99, 3.90)

1.52

(0.93, 2.51)

Participant type

        

 Cardiologist

1

ref

1

ref

1

ref

1

ref

 Surgeon

0.16

(0.04, 0.58)

0.11

(0.04, 0.35)

0.14

(0.03, 0.59)

0.10

(0.03, 0.34)

 Nurse

0.43

(0.11, 1.59)

0.14

(0.04, 0.47)

0.45

(0.10, 1.98)

0.14

(0.04, 0.50)

 Other

0.31

(0.09, 1.05)

0.09

(0.03, 0.32)

0.29

(0.07, 1.19)

0.09

(0.03, 0.32)

  1. Relative risk (RR) reflects the relative likelihood of choosing PCI or both treatments over CABG, compared to that of the referent group in each variable