Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the advantages and disadvantage of 2DE, traditional 3DE, TrueVue, and TrueVue Glass

From: Rare double orifice mitral valve malformation associated with bicuspid aortic valve in Turner syndrome: diagnosed by a series of novel three-dimensional echocardiography and literature review

 

2DE

Traditional 3DE

TrueVue

TrueVue Glass

Advantages

Provide sectional morphology images

Display 3D geometry of structures

Advantages of traditional 3DE

Shield the myocardial tissue

 

High resolution

Show spatial position of MV apparatus

Higher resolution

Depict edges of orifices

  

Delineate anomalous attachments of the sub-valvular apparatus

Realistic light and shadow effects

Show overall aortic valve, arch and coronary artery in its entity

   

Simulate the pathological texture of valves and myocardium

Simulate the thin and translucent leaflets

    

Show global 3D hemodynamic characteristics

Disadvantages

Cannot see the spatial structure characteristics

The texture of the lesion quite different from the real pathological specimen

Shows that thin valves and chordae may appear false echo loss

The scraggly fine texture on the surface of the anatomical structure is insufficient to display

 

Multiple ultrasound views are needed to clarify the anatomy of each component of the Mitral valve apparatus

The level of structure is unclear

Cannot see the surrounding anatomy through the valve

 
 

The lesion is not intuitive, the diagnosis depends more on the experience of the imaging doctor

The boundary is not clear enough

  
 

Time-consuming and laborious

   
  1. 2DE two-dimensional echocardiography, 3DE three-dimensional echocardiography, AV aortic valve, MV mitral valves