Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance and goodness-of-fit of nested models

From: Evaluating the association of social needs assessment data with cardiometabolic health status in a federally qualified community health center patient population

Outcome

Model

C-statistic

95% CI, LL

95% CI, UL

Comparison of C-index (P value)a

Likelihood-ratio test (P value)a

Backwards stepwise logistic

 Obesity

M1

0.5941

0.5675

0.6208

–

–

M2

0.5941

0.5675

0.6208

1.0000

1.0000

M3

0.5992

0.5728

0.6257

0.4163

0.0836

M4

0.6173

0.5912

0.6433

0.0133*

0.0002*

 Hypertension, stage-1

M1

0.6670

0.6421

0.6920

–

–

M2

0.7013

0.6771

0.7256

< 0.0001*

< 0.0001*

M3

0.7059

0.6818

0.7299

0.0991

0.0106*

M4

0.7111

0.6872

0.7350

0.0531

0.0009*

 ASCVD, borderline

M1

0.9021

0.8852

0.9191

–

–

M2

0.9368

0.9228

0.9508

< 0.0001*

< 0.0001*

M3

0.9389

0.9253

0.9526

0.1197

0.0116*

M4

0.9436

0.9307

0.9565

0.0087*

0.0011*

LASSO

 Obesity

M1

0.5654

0.5052

0.6256

–

–

M2

0.5654

0.5052

0.6256

1.0000

1.0000

M3

0.5654

0.5052

0.6256

1.0000

1.0000

M4

0.5896

0.5305

0.6487

0.1301

0.0038*

 Hypertension, stage-1

M1

0.6358

0.5778

0.6938

–

–

M2

0.6749

0.6189

0.7308

0.0230*

< 0.0001*

M3

0.6770

0.6212

0.7329

0.6437

0.0546

M4

0.6806

0.6250

0.7362

0.3969

0.0050*

 ASCVD, borderline

M1

0.8880

0.8458

0.9303

–

–

M2

0.9505

0.9259

0.9751

< 0.0001*

< 0.0001*

M3

0.9486

0.9234

0.9738

0.1339

0.0583

M4

0.9488

0.9241

0.9736

0.9281

0.0170*

  1. aCompared with previous model
  2. *P < 0.05