Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance and goodness-of-fit of nested models

From: Evaluating the association of social needs assessment data with cardiometabolic health status in a federally qualified community health center patient population

Outcome Model C-statistic 95% CI, LL 95% CI, UL Comparison of C-index (P value)a Likelihood-ratio test (P value)a
Backwards stepwise logistic
 Obesity M1 0.5941 0.5675 0.6208
M2 0.5941 0.5675 0.6208 1.0000 1.0000
M3 0.5992 0.5728 0.6257 0.4163 0.0836
M4 0.6173 0.5912 0.6433 0.0133* 0.0002*
 Hypertension, stage-1 M1 0.6670 0.6421 0.6920
M2 0.7013 0.6771 0.7256 < 0.0001* < 0.0001*
M3 0.7059 0.6818 0.7299 0.0991 0.0106*
M4 0.7111 0.6872 0.7350 0.0531 0.0009*
 ASCVD, borderline M1 0.9021 0.8852 0.9191
M2 0.9368 0.9228 0.9508 < 0.0001* < 0.0001*
M3 0.9389 0.9253 0.9526 0.1197 0.0116*
M4 0.9436 0.9307 0.9565 0.0087* 0.0011*
LASSO
 Obesity M1 0.5654 0.5052 0.6256
M2 0.5654 0.5052 0.6256 1.0000 1.0000
M3 0.5654 0.5052 0.6256 1.0000 1.0000
M4 0.5896 0.5305 0.6487 0.1301 0.0038*
 Hypertension, stage-1 M1 0.6358 0.5778 0.6938
M2 0.6749 0.6189 0.7308 0.0230* < 0.0001*
M3 0.6770 0.6212 0.7329 0.6437 0.0546
M4 0.6806 0.6250 0.7362 0.3969 0.0050*
 ASCVD, borderline M1 0.8880 0.8458 0.9303
M2 0.9505 0.9259 0.9751 < 0.0001* < 0.0001*
M3 0.9486 0.9234 0.9738 0.1339 0.0583
M4 0.9488 0.9241 0.9736 0.9281 0.0170*
  1. aCompared with previous model
  2. *P < 0.05