Skip to main content

Table 3 Percutaneous coronary intervention results

From: Impact of acute total occlusion of the culprit artery on outcome in NSTEMI based on the results of a large national registry

 

NSTEMINTO (N = 65,206)

NSTEMITO (N = 16,209)

STEMITO (N = 50,314)

TIMI 3 after PCIa, n (%)

62.114 (95.57)

13.483 (83.36)*

44.494 (88.61)

TIMI 2 after PCIa, n (%)

1.678 (2.58)

834 (5.16)*

2.921 (5.82)

TIMI 1 after PCIa, n (%)

531 (0.82)

333 (2.06)*

971 (1.93)

TIMI 0 after PCIa, n (%)

672 (1.03)

1.525 (9.43)*

829 (3.64)

No reflow after PCI, n (%)

315 (0.48)

218 (1.34%)*

878 (1.75%)

Cardiac arrest during PCI, n (%)

361 (0.55)

175 (1.08)*

1.198 (2.38%)

Death during PCI, n (%)

281 (0.43)

158 (0.97)*

885 (1.76%)

  1. p < 0.0001 for all analyses of study groups by analysis of variance
  2. NSTEMINTO: non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction without total occlusion of culprit artery; NSTEMITO: non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with total occlusion of culprit artery; STEMITO: ST- segment elevation myocardial infarction with total occlusion of culprit artery; TIMI: Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention
  3. p < 0.0001 for post hoc all analyses with the following exception: *p = 0.0005 for post hoc comparison between NSTEMITO and STEMITO; a – data available for 131,385 patients
Back to article page

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us