Skip to main content

Table 4 Association between rice and potato consumption with cardio-metabolic risk factors in logistic regression analysis

From: Is frequency of potato and white rice consumption associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents: the CASPIAN-V study

 

Rice Consumption

Potato Consumption

OR

95% CI

p-Value

OR

95% CI

p-Value

High FBS

Model 1

1.301

.790–2.143

.301

1.144

.796–1.645

.467

Model 2

1.123

.665–1.898

.664

1.332

.906–1.958

.144

Model 3

1.110

.657–1.877

.697

1.308

.888–1.927

.174

High TG

Model 1

.973

.794–1.192

.793

.942

.795–1.116

.489

Model 2

.947

.756–1.185

.633

.935

.775–1.127

.479

Model 3

.942

. 752–1.181

.607

.922

.764–1.113

.398

High TC

Model 1

1.313

.827–2.087

.249

1.175

.841–1.641

.345

Model 2

1.433

.841–2.440

.185

1.206

.835–1.741

.318

Model 3

1.418

.832–2.417

.199

1.187

.820–1.720

.364

Low HDL

Model 1

1.012

.828–1.236

.910

1.003

.851–1.183

.970

Model 2

1.053

.840–1.321

.653

.955

.794–1.150

.630

Model 3

1.055

.840–1.325

.645

.948

.786–1.142

.571

High LDL

Model 1

.854

.677–1.076

.181

1.122

.924–1.362

.245

Model 2

.896

.689–1.164

.409

1.152

.930–1.426

.195

Model 3

.890

.685–1.157

.383

1.152

.930–1.427

.196

High BP

Model 1

.986

.854–1.138

.848

1.065

.940–1.207

.324

Model 2

1.019

.865–1.201

.820

1.063

.925–1.223

.389

Model 3

1.034

.875–1.221

.697

1.048

.910–1.206

.518

Mets

Model 1

1.115

.719–1.730

.626

1.043

.739–1.471

.811

Model 2

1.087

.668–1.768

.738

1.079

.738–1.577

.694

Model 3

1.104

.667–1.829

.700

1.014

.685–1.501

.944

Abdominal obesity

Model 1

.976

.873–1.092

.677

1.074

.974–1.185

.151

Model 2

.942

.830–1.069

.357

1.114

.999–1.242

.052

Overweight

Model 1

1.040

.89–1.22

.631

1.142

.99–1.30

.053

Model 2

1.029

.860–1.230

.757

1.207

1.042–1.399

.012

Obesity

Model 1

1.037

.896–1.199

.629

.993

.875–1.128

.917

Model 2

.981

.831–1.158

.820

1.098

.956–1.262

.186

  1. MetS metabolic syndrome, FBS fasting blood sugar, TC total cholesterol, TG triglycerides, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, BP blood pressure;
  2. Defined as above the 85th percentile. Overweight: BMI 85th–95th; obesity: BMI >95th; low HDL: 110 mg/dL; high TG: 100 mg/dL; high TC: > 200 mg/dL; high FBS: > 100 mg/dL; high blood pressure: >90th (adjusted by age, sex, height); Abdominal obesity: WHtR> 0.5; MetS, ATP-III criteria;
  3. Model 1: Crude Model
  4. Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex, region, SES, PA, ST, family history of chronic diseases, and food habits (fast foods and sweetened beverages)
  5. Model 3: Additionally adjusted for BMI
Back to article page

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2261

Contact us