Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the RCTs included in the meta-analysis

From: Assessing the risk of angiotensin receptor blockers on major cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Trial name, year publication

Population

Setting

Intervention

Control

Follow up (in months)

Male (%)

Mean / median age (years)

Mean BMI (kg/m2)

Mean cholesterol (mg/dL)

Mean LDL (mg/dL)

Mean HDL (mg/dL)

Mean triglyceride (mg/dL)

Non-smoker (%)

Hypertension (%)

Heart failure (%)

Diabetes mellitus (%)

Ischaemic / coronary artery disease (%)

Chronic kidney disease (%)

4C (2016) [16]

Patients with IHD after coronary stent implantation

39 centres in Japan

Candesartan

Standard care without ARB

36

73

69

24

NR

111

49

140

83

73

8

35

100

NR

ACTIVE I (2011) [17]

Patients with atrial fibrillation

600 centres worldwide

Irbesartan

Placebo

54

61

70

29

NR

NR

NR

NR

50

88

32

20

NR

NR

CARP (2011) [18]

Patients that received a coronary stent

5 centres in Hiroshima, Japan

Valsartan

Non-ARB therapy

48

79

65

24

NR

NR

NR

NR

50

75

NR

43

100

30

CASE-J (2008) [19]

Patients with high-risk hypertension

527 physicians from Japan

Candesartan

Amlodipine

41

55

64

25

NR

NR

NR

NR

79

100

0

43

43

24

CHARM-Added (2003) [20]

Patients with CHF and LVEF< 40

618 centres in 26 countries

Candesartan

Placebo

41

79

64

28

NR

NR

NR

NR

83

48

100

30

68

NR

CHARM-Alternative (2003) [7]

Patients with symptomatic CHF and LVEF< 40%

618 centres in 26 countries

Candesartan

Placebo

34

68

67

28

NR

NR

NR

NR

86

50

100

27

62

NR

CHARM-Preserved (2003) [21]

Patients with HF and LVEF> 40

618 centres in 26 countries

Candesartan

Placebo

37

60

67

29

NR

NR

NR

NR

87

64

100

28

56

NR

Cice et al. (2010) [22]

Patients with CHF and in haemodialysis

30 clinics in Italy

Telmisartan

Placebo

36

90

63

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

61

NR

100

29

57

100

DETAIL (2004) [23]

Patients with diabetes mellitus and nephropathy

39 centres in northern Europe

Telmisartan

Enalapril

60

73

61

31

223

137

48

207

37

100

0

100

NR

100

DIRECT-Prevent 1 (2008) [15]

Patients with type 1 diabetes a no retinopathy

309 centres worldwide

Candesartan

Placebo

56

56

30

24

184

NR

66

NR

74

NR

NR

100

NR

0

DIRECT-Protect 1 (2008) [15]

Patients with type 1 diabetes and retinopathy

309 centres worldwide

Candesartan

Placebo

56

57

32

25

186

NR

66

NR

74

NR

NR

100

NR

0

DIRECT-Protect 2 (2008) [24]

Patients with type 2 diabetes and retinopathy

309 centres worldwide

Candesartan

Placebo

56

50

57

29

205

NR

NR

NR

73

62

NR

100

5

0

E-COST (2005) [25]

Patients with hypertension

Centres in Saitama, Japan

Candesartan

Non-ARB therapy

37

48

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

100

0

0

0

NR

E-COST-R (2005) [26]

Patients with hypertension and mild renal impairment

Centres in Saitama, Japan

Candesartan

Non-ARB therapy

37

59

67

NR

181

NR

NR

NR

NR

100

0

0

6

100

ELITE (1997) [27]

Patients with CHF and LVEF< 40%

125 centres in the USA, Europe, and South America

Losartan

Captopril

13

67

74

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

88

57

100

25

50

7

ELITE II (2000) [28]

Patients with CHF and LVEF< 40%

289 centres in 46 countries

Losartan

Captopril

23

69

71

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

49

100

24

79

NR

GISSI-AF (2009) [29]

Patients with history of atrial fibrillation

100 centres in Italy

Valsartan

Placebo

12

62

68

28

NR

NR

NR

NR

81

85

8

15

12

3

HIJ-CREATE (2009) [30]

Patients with coronary artery disease and hypertension

14 centres in Japan

Candesartan

Non-ARB therapy

50

80

66

25

193

NR

45

128

64

100

21

38

100

NR

HOPE-3 (2016) [31]

Patients with intermediate cardiovascular risk

228 centres in 21 countries

Candesartan + hydrochlorothiazide

Placebo

67

54

66

27

201

128

45

128

72

38

0

5.8

0

0

IDNT (2003) [32]

Patients with diabetes mellitus and nephropathy

Centres in the North America, Europe, Latin America, South East Asia, and Oceania

Irbesartan

Amlodipine or placeboa

31

64

59

31

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

100

0

100

28

100

I-PRESERVE (2008) [33]

Patients with CHF and LVEF > 45%

Centres in 25 countries

Irbesartan

Placebo

50

40

72

30

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

89

100

28

0

0

IRMA-2 (2001) [34]

Patients with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and micro-albuminuria

96 centres worldwide

Irbesartanb

Placebo

24

69

58

30

224

140

44

180

81

100

NR

100

6

0

J-RHYTHM II (2011) [35]

Patients with hypertension and atrial fibrillation

48 centres in Japan

Candesartan

Amlodipine

12

69

66

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

100

3

9

1

NR

Kondo et al. (2003) [36]

Patients with history of coronary intervention

Ogaki Municipal Hospital in Japan

Standard care + Candesartan

Standard care without candesartan

24

76

65

24

187

114

49

126

76

44

2

25

100

NR

KYOTO HEART (2009) [37]

Patients with uncontrolled hypertension

31 centres from Kyoto, Japan

Valsartan

Non-ARB therapy

39

57

66

39

NR

122

55

149

78

100

7

27

23

NR

LIFE (2002) [38]

Patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy

830 centres from the USA, the UK, and Scandinavia

Losartan

Atenolol

58

46

67

28

232

NR

58

NR

84

100

0

13

16

NR

MOSES (2005) [39]

High-risk hypertensive patients

Centres in Germany and Austria

Eprosartan

Nitredipine

45

54

68

28

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

100

26

37

26

5.4

NAVIGATOR (2010) [40]

Patients with impaired glucose tolerance

806 centres in 40 countries

Valsartan

Placebo

60

49

64

31

210

127

50

151

89

78

NR

49

12

11

OCTOPUS (2013) [41]

Patients with hypertension and in haemodialysis

66 dialysis centres in Okinawa, Japan

Olmesartan

Non-ARB therapy

60

62

60

24

155

NR

NR

155

65

100

NR

32

7

100

ONTARGET (2008) [42]

Patients with coronary, peripheral, cerebrovascular disease or diabetes with end-organ damage

733 centres in 40 countries

Telmisartan

Ramipril or ramipril + telmisartanc

56

77

66

28

190

112

50

151

36

69

0

37

75

NR

OPTIMAAL (2002) [43]

Patients with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure

329 centres in 7 European countries

Losartan

Captopril

35

69

67

27

212

130

45

168

NR

36

6

17

100

NR

ORIENT (2011) [44]

Patients with diabetes mellitus with proteinuria

Centres in Japan and Hong Kong

Olmesartan

Placebo

38

69

59

25

208

NR

NR

NR

75

100

4

100

5

100

PRoFESS (2008) [45]

Patients with a recent ischaemic stroke

695 centres in 35 countries

Telmisartan

Placebo

30

64

66

27

NR

NR

NR

NR

43

74

3

28

NR

NR

RENAAL (2001) [46]

Patients with diabetes and nephropathy

250 centres in 28 countries

Losartan

Placebo

41

63

60

30

228

142

45

219

82

93

0

100

11

100

ROAD (2007) [47]

Patients with proteinuria and chronic renal insufficiency

Nanfang Hospital Renal Division in China

Losartan

Benazepril

44

63

50

23

97

NR

NR

177

NR

63

0

0

0

100

SCAST (2011) [48]

Patients with acute stroke

146 centres in Europe

Candesartan

Placebo

6

58

71

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

70

NR

16

NR

NR

SCOPE (2003) [49]

Patients with mild to moderate elevated blood pressure

527 centres in Europe

Candesartan

Placebo

45

36

76

27

239

NR

NR

NR

91

52

NR

12

4

NR

SUPPORT (2015) [50]

Patients with hypertension and CHF

17 centres in Tohoku, Japan

Olmesartan

Non-ARB therapy

53

75

66

25

NR

108

NR

NR

NR

100

100

50

47

0

Suzuki et al. (2008) [51]

Patients with kidney failure treated with haemodialysis

5 dialysis centres in Saitama, Japan

Losartan, candesartan, or valsartan

Non-ARB therapy

36

59

60

21

157

NR

NR

NR

78

93

16

52

2

100

Takahashi et al. (2006) [52]

Patients with kidney failure treated with haemodialysis

Enshu General Hospital in Japan

Candesartan

Nothing

19

58

61

20

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

81

0

33

0

100

TRANSCEND (2008) [53]

Patients with coronary, peripheral, cerebrovascular disease or diabetes with end-organ damage, and intolerant to ACE inhibitors

630 centres in 40 countries

Telmisartan

Placebo

56

57

67

28

197

117

49

158

47

76

0

36

74

NR

T-VENTURE (2009) [54]

Patients with acute myocardial infarction

4 centres in Japan

Valsartan

ACE inhibitor therapy

6

83

63

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

40

57

0

34

100

NR

Val-HeFT (2001) [55]

Patients with heart failure

302 centres in 16 countries

Valsartan

Placebo

23

80

63

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

100

25

57

NR

VALIANT (2003) [56]

Patients with recent myocardial infarction and LVEF < 35%

931 centres in 24 countries

Valsartan

Captoprild

25

78

65

27

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

56

15

23

100

NR

VALUE (2004) [6]

Patients with hypertension and high risk of cardiac event

Centres in 31 countries

Valsartan

Amlodipine

50

58

67

29

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

93

6

NR

45

NR

  1. ACE Angiotensin-converting enzyme, ARB Angiotensin II receptor blockers, CHF Congestive heart failure, IHD Ischaemic heart disease, LVEF Left-ventricular ejection fraction, NR Not reported
  2. aIDNT (2003): Two control groups, placebo group was excluded
  3. bIRMA-2 (2001): Two intervention groups, irbesartan 150 mg daily and irbesartan 300 mg daily were combined
  4. cONTARGET (2008): Three intervention groups, ramipril + telmisartan group was excluded
  5. dVALIANT (2003) Three intervention groups, valsartan + captopril group was excluded