Skip to main content

Table 1 Reductions in mean sitting DBP (msDBP) and mean sitting DBP (msSBP)

From: Clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of Aliskiren Monotherapy (AM): an umbrella review of systematic reviews

Outcome

No. of SRs

No. of original studies

No. of cases/ controls

Follow-up range (weeks)

Estimate (95%CI)

P- value

95%PI

I2(P*)

Egger’s P value

msDBP

 aliskiren75mg vs placebo

1

5

821/279

8–13

− 2.05 [− 3.13,-0.96]

< 0.001

[− 3.81,-0.28]

0%(0.73)

0.043

 aliskiren150mg vs placebo

1

12

2665/1118

8–26

−3.19 [−4.02, -2.37]

< 0.001

[−5.57,-0.82]

47%(0.04)

0.798

 aliskiren300mg vs placebo

1

10

2193/808

8–26

−4.51 [−5.27, −3.76]

< 0.001

[− 5.97, − 3.06]

17%(0.29)

0.359

 aliskiren600mg vs placebo

1

2

296/97

8

−5.86 [−7.73, -3.99]

< 0.0001

NA

0%(0.57)

NA

 aliskiren vs ARBs (low dose)

2

4

648/532

4–8

0.07 [−0.94,1.09]

0.89

[−2.15,2.30]

0%(0.48)

0.12

 aliskiren vs ARBs (low to high dose)

2

5

923/944

8–12

−0.25 [−2.32,1.82]

0.81

[−7.82,7.31]

82% (0.0002)

0.272

 aliskiren vs ARBs (high dose)

2

3

241/122

8

−0.65 [−2.52, 1.23]

0.5

[−12.79,11.49]

0%(0.89)

0.293

 aliskiren vs ACEIs

2

3

796/786

≥8

−1.19[− 1.99, −0.38]

0.004

[−6.42,4.05]

0%(0.53)

0.687

 aliskiren vs amlodipine

1

1

203/181

8

3.63 [1.85,5.41]

< 0.0001

NA

NA

NA

 aliskiren vs HCTZ

1

1

183/176

8

−0.9 [−2.56,0.76]

0.29

NA

NA

NA

 aliskiren vs atenolol

1

1

231/231

12

2.4 [0.74,4.06]

0.004

NA

NA

NA

 Aliskiren150mg vs 75 mg

1

5

830/824

8–13

−0.8 [−1.58,-0.03]

0.04

[−2.06,0.04]

0%(0.45)

0.944

 aliskiren300mg vs 150 mg

1

10

2193/2195

8–26

−1.75 [−2.31, − 1.20]

< 0.001

[− 2.88,-0.63]

20%(0.26)

0.584

 aliskiren600mg vs 300 mg

1

2

296/296

8

−0.68[−2.03,0.67]

0.449

NA

33%(0.22)

NA

msSBP

 aliskiren75mg vs placebo

1

5

821/279

8–13

−2.97[−4.76, -1.18]

0.001

[−5.88,-0.66]

0%(0.57)

0.253

 aliskiren150mg vs placebo

1

12

2665/1121

8–26

−5.93[−6.94, -4.91]

< 0.001

[−7.93,-3.92]

17%(0.28)

0.674

 aliskiren300mg vs placebo

1

10

2199/810

8–26

−7.91 [−9.15, −6.67]

< 0.001

[−10.48,-5.33]

22%(0.24)

0.693

 aliskiren600mg vs placebo

1

2

296/97

8

−11.35[− 14.43,-8.27]

< 0.00001

NA

0%(0.62)

NA

 aliskiren vs ARBs (low dose)

2

4

648/532

4–8

1.25 [−0.29,2.78]

0.111

[−2.57,5.06]

6%(0.36)

0.661

 aliskiren vs ARBs (low to high dose)

2

5

923/944

8–12

−1.19[−4.09, 1.70]

0.42

[−11.46,9.08]

77% (0.002)

0.242

 aliskiren vs ARBs (high dose)

2

3

241/122

8

0.24 [−2.29, 2.76]

0.85

[−16.10,16.57]

0%(0.65)

0.841

 aliskiren vs ACEIs

2

4

1253/1230

≥8

−2.37[−3.48, −1.26]

< 0.0001

[−4.83,0.04]

0%(0.59)

0.123

 aliskiren vs amlodipine

1

1

203/181

8

5.67 [2.86,8.48]

< 0.0001

NA

NA

NA

 aliskiren vs HCTZ

1

1

183/176

8

−1.4 [−4.04,1.24]

0.3

NA

NA

NA

 aliskiren vs atenolol

1

1

231/231

12

−0.08 [−3.02,2.86]

0.96

NA

NA

NA

 aliskiren150mg vs 75 mg

1

5

830/821

8–13

−1.89 [−3.34, −0.43]

0.011

[−5.37,1.59]

23%(0.27)

0.872

 aliskiren300mg vs 150 mg

1

10

2199/2195

8–26

−2.57 [−3.72, −1.42]

< 0.0001

[− 5.87,0.73]

52%(0.03)

0.921

 aliskiren600mg vs 300 mg

1

2

296/296

8

−0.61 [−2.78, 1.56]

0.581

NA

0%(0.60)

NA

  1. Notes: Type of metric: WMD (Weighted mean difference)
  2. Abbreviations: NA Not Accessible, SR Systematic review