Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of the Included Studies

From: Indirect comparison of novel Oral anticoagulants among Asians with non-Valvular atrial fibrillation in the real world setting: a network meta-analysis

Study

Country

Treatment

Sample Size (n)

Age (years)

Males (%)

CHADS2 –VASc score

History of stroke/TIA (%)

Hypertension (%)

Renal dysfunction (%)

Heart failure (%)

Diabetes (%)

Ho 2012 [17]

Hong Kong

Dabigatran

122

70.00

55.7

2.48

43.4

69.7

9

25.4

28.7

Warfarin

122

70.01

52.5

2.32

32.0

63.1

13

31.1

34.4

Yap 2016 [18]

Malaysia

Dabigatran

500

65.3

62

2.69

NR

68.4

NR

6.2

31.4

Warfarin

500

66.8

61.2

3.40

NR

75.6

NR

25.6

43.2

Chan 2016 [19]

Taiwan

Dabigatran

9940

75

58

4.13

33

87

23%

16

41

Warfarin

9913

76

58

4.16

33

87

23%

16

41

Chan 2016 [20]

Taiwan

Rivaroxaban

3916

76

46

4.12

29

87

22%

16

41

Dabigatran

5921

75

58

4.08

32

86

22%

16

41

Warfarin

5251

71

56

3.32

20

75

21%

16

36

Cha 2017 [21]

Korea

Rivaroxaban

5681

70.5

52.7

3.60

NR

75.7

NR

44.3

23.8

Dabigatran

3741

69.3

58.0

3.57

NR

76.8

NR

45.0

26.5

Apixaban

2189

70.3

54.4

3.51

NR

76.9

NR

43.0

23.6

Warfarin

23222

68.82

56.9

3.57

NR

76.9

NR

51.3

26.1

Naganuma 2017 [22]

Japan

Dabigatran

181

69

72

3.0

29

61

NR

18

29

Warfarin

181

69

72

3.1

31

64

NR

15

29

Lai 2017 [23]

Taiwan

Rivaroxaban

4600

75.4

54.8

3.3

19.5

49.7

NR

NR

20.2

Dabigatran

4600

75.4

54.6

3.3

19.1

49.4

NR

NR

20.4

Kohsaka 2017 [24]

Japan

Rivaroxaban

6726

75.8

62.0

3.3

22.3

53.8

4.4

35.3

28.9

Dabigatran

5090

73.1

65.9

3.0

19.9

50.9

2.5

28.9

27.6

Apixaban

5977

77.4

59.4

3.5

22.4

54.0

7.3

38.7

27.9

Warfarin

14037

77.6

60.1

3.6

22.3

55.9

13.3

43.1

29.6

Hsu 2017 [25]

Taiwan

Rivaroxaban

300

75.2

44.7

NR

35.7

92.3

43.3

41.3

100

Dabigatran

305

75.1

56.4

NR

33.8

91.8

38.4

40.3

100

Warfarin

1899

70.0

50.9

NR

35.5

87.2

38.5

46.5

100

Deitelzweig 2017 [26]

Japan

Rivaroxaban

11082

77.2

52.5

4.4

11.5

NR

NR

NR

NR

Dabigatran

2474

76.8

55.1

4.3

10.9

NR

NR

NR

NR

Apixaban

8250

78.0

51.5

4.6

11.8

NR

NR

NR

NR

Warfarin

14051

78.2

55.2

4.7

15.8

NR

NR

NR

NR

Lee 2018 [27]

Taiwan

Rivaroxaban

732

74.68

61.34

3.9

19.95

85.93

36.07

20.22

46.86

Dabigatran

535

73.57

65.98

3.82

21.5

86.54

29.91

21.50

46.36

Apixaban

171

75.36

55.56

3.98

20.47

87.72

41.52

18.71

43.86

Warfarin

946

72.41

63.70

3.66

18.24

83.52

83.52

22.29

44.89

Huang 2018 [28]

Taiwan

Rivaroxaban

9637

75.20

54.56

4.02

26.25

73.74

11.72

35.35

31.00

Warfarin

9637

74.98

54.70

4.11

26.97

74.02

11.97

36.77

31.79

Chan 2018 [29]

Taiwan

Rivaroxaban

27777

75

55

3.83

20

86

24%

13

39

Dabigatran

20079

75

60

3.74

24

84

20%

11

38

Apixaban

5843

76

55

3.89

20

87

29%

13

41

Warfarin

19375

71

58

3.26

15

78

24%

14

36

Jeong 2019 [30]

Korea

Rivaroxaban

804

71.4

63.3

3.3

29.2

53.5

NR

5.7

24.1

Warfarin

804

70.4

60.4

3.4

29.2

54.7

NR

5.1

22.3

Koretsune 2019 [31]

Japan

Dabigatran

4606

74

66

3.3

13

NR

NR

35

29

Warfarin

4606

73

66

3.3

13

NR

NR

35

29

Cho 2019 [32]

Korea

Rivaroxaban

21000

73.8

50.9

3.6

21.1

87.8

NR

20.5

45.5

Dabigatran

12593

72.9

53.6

3.5

24.3

87.0

NR

18.0

45.5

Apixaban

12502

74.3

47.7

3.7

24

86.7

NR

20.6

45.3

Warfarin

10409

70.8

54.0

3.5

27.3

85.9

NR

22.8

48.4

  1. Age and follow-up duration reported in mean or median. MI = myocardial infarction; TIA = transient ischemic attack; NR = no results