Skip to main content

Table 2 Main features of the studies

From: Cardiovascular outcomes associated with crush versus provisional stenting techniques for bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Studies

No of participants assigned to crush technique (n)

No of participants assigned to provisional stenting technique (n)

Time period of patients’ enrollment (years)

Type of study

Bias risk grade

Baystrukov2017

73

73

2011–2013

RCT

B

CACTUS

177

173

2004–2007

RCT

A

DKCRUSH II

183

183

2007–2009

RCT

A

DKCRUSH V

240

242

2011–2016

RCT

A

Galassi2009

199

258

2004–2006

OS

Kim2015

213

206

2008–2015

RCT

A

Total no of patients (n)

1085

1135

   
  1. Abbreviations: RCT randomized controlled trials, OS observational studies