Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of the ACAOS studies published from 2010

From: Prognostic value of dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) angiography characteristics in anomalous coronary artery from the opposite sinus (ACAOS) patients: a large-scale retrospective study

Study

Area, Study-time

Prevalence(N)

Age

R/L

Focus

Frommelt PC, 2011 [10]

America, 1999–2009

NA (27)

55.3 ± 13.5

20/7

B

Mumtaz MA, 2011 [11]

America, 1998–2008

NA (22)

15(5–54) a

15/7

B

Krasuski, RA, 2011 [12]

America, 1966–2007

0.14%(301/210700)

57.7 ± 14.3

238/63

B

Xu,H, 2011 [13]

Asia, 2006–2011

0.57%(69/12145)

57.6a

51/18

C

Miller JA, 2012 [14]

America, 2004–2012

NA (15)

37.3 ± 18.9

10/5

A

Lee HJ, 2012 [15]

Asia, 2005–1020

0.68%(156/22925)

56a

124/32

A, C

Tuo G, 2013 [16]

European, 1994–2006

0.55%(44/7960)

67 ± 7.2

14/30

C

Opolski MP, 2013 [17]

European, 2008–2012

0.84(72/8522)

55 ± 12

20/53

A, C

Krupiński M, 2014 [18]

European, 6 consecutive years

0.76% (54/7115)

60.9 ± 11.6

16/38

A

Mainwaring RD, 2014

America,1999–2013

NA (69)

15b

47/22

B

Sharma V, 2014 [19]

America,1992–2011

NA (75)

39.6 ± 19.6

69/6

B

Poynter JA,2014 [20]

America,1998–2009

NA (196)

10.2a

144/51

B

Ashrafpoor G. 2015 [21]

European,2008–2013

0.46%(19/4160)

47.05 ± 9.75

16/38

A

Nasis A, 2015 [22]

Australia,2008–2013

1.09%(107/9774)

58.1 ± 12.6

36/71

A, C

Kooij M, 2015 [23]

European,201–2014

NA (31)

38a

26/5

B

Feins EN, 2015 [6]

America,1974–2014

NA (259)

42.5 ± 2.7

24/6/1

B

Cheezum MK, 2016 [24]

America,2004–2014

2.2% (131/5991)

52 ± 17

45/63

A

Law Timothy, 2016 [5]

Australia,2002–2014

NA (16)

46.6 ± 16.1

16/0

B

Driesen BW, 2018 [25]

Netherlands, 2010–2017

NA

52 (36–64)

25/5

C

  1. A: High-risk anatomy; B: surgical intervention; C: follow-up prognosis; N: number of patients
  2. aThe standard deviation was not applicable
  3. bThe value is expressed in median with 0.25 to 0.75 quantile