Skip to main content

Table 2 CTFCs and Topographical Parameters Comparisons by Markis Types

From: Correlation of increased corrected TIMI frame counts and the topographical extent of isolated coronary artery ectasia

 

Markis IV

(n = 17)

Markis III

(n = 21)

Markis II

(n = 23)

Markis I

(n = 16)

P-valuea

Rs b

CTFCindex

28.28 ± 4.83

36.8 ± 10.13

40.04 ± 11.62

56.35 ± 20.95

< 0.001

0.603

Dindex (mm)

5.65 ± 0.85

6.16 ± 0.82

6.75 ± 1.01

7.15 ± 1.77

< 0.001

0.471

ERindex

1.61 ± 0.16

1.78 ± 0.22

1.94 ± 0.28

2.07 ± 0.48

< 0.001

0.573

LDindex (mm)

28.29 ± 7.33

58.57 ± 11.49

59.35 ± 14.17

63.63 ± 12.78

< 0.001

0.623

LDtotal (mm)

28.06 ± 7.34

58.57 ± 11.49

83.26 ± 14.45

131.94 ± 34.52

< 0.001

0.901

EEAindex (mm2)

149.84 ± 36.68

361.81 ± 93.37

524.93 ± 126.62

893.99 ± 421.2

< 0.001

0.653

EEAtotal (mm2)

149.84 ± 36.68

361.81 ± 93.37

397.97 ± 123.92

456.36 ± 190.76

< 0.001

0.889

  1. Abbreviations: D Diameter, ER Ectatic ratio, LD Linear dimension, EEA Estimated ectatic area
  2. aOne-way ANOVA, bSpearman’s Rank