Skip to main content

Table 1 Differences between LVNC patients and controls

From: Auxiliary diagnostic potential of ventricle geometry and late gadolinium enhancement in left ventricular non-compaction; non-randomized case control study

 

Controls

LVNC

Chi square

 

n = 155

n = 100

Male

95 (61.3%)

56 (56.0%)

0.401

Female

60 (38.7%)

44 (44.0%)

LVEF < 50%

37 (23.9%)

48 (48.0%)

<0.001

OK

79 (51.0%)

0 (0.0%)

<0.001

LVNC

0 (0.0%)

100 (100.0%)

DCM

27 (17.4%)

0 (0.0%)

HCM

33 (21.3%)

0 (0.0%)

ARVD

5 (3.2%)

0 (0.0%)

HHD

6 (3.9%)

0 (0.0%)

MCD

5 (3.2%)

0 (0.0%)

 

Controls

LVNC

Mann-Whitney

 

n = 155

n = 100

Age (years)

48.2 ± 15.4

45.5 ± 17.8

0.180

LA (cm2)

26.9 ± 8.6

25.6 ± 6.4

0.333

RA (cm2)

24.6 ± 7.6

23.1 ± 6.2

0.155

LVEDD (cm)

5.4 ± 1.0

5.7 ± 0.8

<0.001

IVS (cm)

1.2 ± 0.4

1.0 ± 0.2

0.001

EDV (mL)

160.3 ± 78.7

169.4 ± 61.3

0.036

ESV (mL)

79.4 ± 76.4

95.9 ± 69.1

<0.001

SV (mL)

84.4 ± 45.7

78.5 ± 25.6

0.244

LVEF (%)

55.3 ± 15.2

48.2 ± 12.7

<0.001

MM (gram)

122.2 ± 48.5

106.0 ± 36.3

0.006

  1. LVNC Left ventricular non compaction, OK No structural heart disease, DCM Dilative cardiomyopathy, HCM Hypertophic cardiomyopathy, ARVD Arrhythmogenic right ventricle disease, HHD Hypertensive heart disease, MCD Myocarditis, LVEDD (cm) Left ventricle end diastolic dimension in 4-chamber view, IVS (cm) Interventricular septum thickness in 4-chamber view, LA (cm2) Left atrial area in square centimeters in 4-chamber view, LVEF (%) Left ventricle ejection fraction, EDV (mL) End diastolic volume, ESV (mL) End systolic volume, SV (mL) Stroke volume, LVEF (%) Left ventricle ejection fraction, MM (gram) Myocardial mass in end-diastole. Data shown as numbers with percentages or means with standard deviations (SD). Significant values are outlined in bold