Integrative and quantitive evaluation of the efficacy of his bundle related pacing in comparison with conventional right ventricular pacing: a meta-analysis

Table 1 General description of included clinical studies

Author	Year	Region	N of patients	Selection of patients	Study design	Median follow-up duration	DHBP of total HBRP (%)	N of HBRP implantation failure
Eraldo, et al.	2006	Italy	197	AF	Prospective crossover blinded randomized controlled study	6 months	0 (0)	1
Kenneth, et al.	2015	America	173	unselected	Observational study	24 months	34 (45)	NG
Domenico, et al.	2012	Italy	26	nonHF	Prospective crossover cohort	34 months	20 (76.9)	NG
Francesco, et al.	2008	Italy	12	nonHF	Prospective crossover cohort	6 months	12 (100)	NG
Gianni, et al.	2014	Italy	37	nonHF	Prospective crossover cohort	3 months	17 (46)	0
Mads, et al.	2014	Denmark	38	nonHF	Prospective crossover blinded randomized controlled study	12 months	4 (10.5)	3
Domenico, et al.	2006	Italy	24	unselected	Prospective crossover cohort	7 months	17 (73.9%)	1

AF atrial fibrillation, N number, DHBP direct his bundle pacing, HBRP his bundle related pacing, NG not given

ISSN: 1471-2261