Impact of hypertension with or without diabetes on left ventricular remodeling in rural Chinese population: a cross-sectional study

Table 3 Multiple logistic regression analysis in HT and HT + DM groups for men and women

Classification	LVH		Concentric remodeling		Concentric hypertrophy		Eccentric hypertrophy
Classification	OR (95% CI)	P	OR (95% CI)	P	OR (95% CI)	P	OR (95% CI)	P
Total
Control	1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00
HT	2.81 (2.43–3.26)	<0.001^*	1.32 (1.09–1.59)	0.004^*	4.41 (3.28–5.92)	<0.001^*	2.24 (1.90–2.64)	<0.001^*
HT + DM	3.94 (3.08–5.03)	<0.001^*	1.23 (0.86–1.75)	0.248	7.20 (4.91–10.55)	<0.001^*	2.38 (1.80–3.16)	<0.001^*
HT	1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00
HT + DM	1.40 (1.12–1.75)	0.003^*	1.01 (0.72–1.42)	0.953	1.61 (1.22–2.12)	0.001^*	1.07 (0.83–1.39)	0.604
Men
Control	1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00
HT	2.93 (2.31–3.72)	<0.001^*	1.71 (1.27–2.29)	<0.001^*	4.66 (2.95–7.35)	<0.001^*	2.27 (1.72–2.98)	<0.001^*
HT + DM	4.34 (2.98–6.33)	<0.001^*	1.83 (1.09–3.05)	0.022	6.67 (3.68–12.10)	<0.001^*	2.98 (1.90–4.65)	<0.001^*
HT	1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00
HT + DM	1.41 (0.81–2.17)	0.153	1.07 (0.66–1.74)	0.777	1.42 (0.92–2.19)	0.116	1.25 (0.84–1.87)	0.274
Women
Control	1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00
HT	2.74 (2.26–3.31)	<0.001^*	1.12 (0.87–1.43)	0.383^*	4.11 (2.78–6.08)	<0.001^*	2.24 (1.82–2.75)	<0.001^*
HT + DM	3.68 (2.65–5.10)	<0.001^*	0.95 (0.58–1.55)	0.836	7.21 (4.35–11.95)	<0.001^*	2.11 (1.46–3.03)	<0.001^*
HT	1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00
HT + DM	1.38 (1.02–1.87)	0.035^*	0.96 (0.60–1.55)	0.865	1.71 (1.18–2.45)	0.004^*	0.98 (0.70–1.38)	0.898

Adjustment for age, gender, race, height, weight, WC, heart rate, smoking, drinking, TC, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C, PC, hemoglobin, UA,antihypertensive and antidiabetic medication
HT hypertension without diabetes, HT + DM hypertension with diabetes, LVH left ventricular hypertrophy
^* P < 0.05

ISSN: 1471-2261