Skip to main content

Table 2 Echocardiographic parameters comparison

From: Impact of hypertension with or without diabetes on left ventricular remodeling in rural Chinese population: a cross-sectional study

Variables

Control

HT

HT + DM

N = 4990

N = 4462

N = 818

IVSd, cm

0.84 ± 0.15

0.92 ± 0.30*

0.94 ± 0.25#†

LVIDd, cm

4.64 ± 0.39

4.76 ± 0.42*

4.76 ± 0.45#

LVIDs, cm

3.05 ± 0.39

3.15 ± 0.43*

3.16 ± 0.43#

PWTd, cm

0.83 ± 0.29

0.89 ± 0.21*

0.92 ± 0.28#†

LVM, g

123.00 ± 73.62

151.87 ± 94.89*

159.60 ± 139.43#†

LVMI, g/m2.7

35.98 ± 20.67

42.49 ± 25.77*

45.03 ± 36.37#†

RWT

0.36 ± 0.08

0.38 ± 0.09*

0.39 ± 0.08#†

LVH, n (%)

369 (7.4%)

1209 (27.1%)

293 (35.8%)**

AOD, cm

2.20 ± 0.30

2.27 ± 0.30*

2.28 ± 0.32#

LAD, cm

3.27 ± 0.36

3.44 ± 0.39*

3.49 ± 0.40#†

LAD/BSA, cm/ m2

2.03 ± 0.23

2.08 ± 0.26*

2.08 ± 0.26#

E wave, cm/s

75.90 ± 19.30

70.78 ± 18.90*

66.47 ± 18.13#†

A wave, cm/s

70.24 ± 15.64

80.22 ± 17.45*

86.71 ± 18.37#†

E/A

1.16 ± 1.43

1.03 ± 6.55

0.82 ± 0.67#

LVEDV, ml

100.35 ± 19.59

106.55 ± 22.08*

107.01 ± 26.26#

LVESV, ml

37.54 ± 11.80

40.67 ± 13.59*

40.82 ± 13.60#

SV, ml

62.81 ± 16.07

65.88 ± 18.42*

66.19 ± 22.79#

LVEF, %

0.62 ± 0.10

0.62 ± 0.10*

0.62 ± 0.10#

FS, %

0.34 ± 0.07

0.34 ± 0.07*

0.34 ± 0.08

Normal geometry, n (%)

4346 (87.1%)

2869 (64.3%)

445 (54.4%)**

Concentric remodeling, n (%)

275 (5.5%)

384 (8.6%)

80 (9.8%)**

Concentric hypertrophy, n (%)

60 (1.2)

432 (9.7%)

129 (15.8%)**

Eccentric hypertrophy, n (%)

309 (6.2%)

777 (17.4%)

164 (20.0%)**

  1. HT hypertension without diabetes, HT + DM hypertension with diabetes
  2. * P < 0.05 between HT and Control, # P < 0.05 between HT + DM and Control, † P < 0.05 between HT + DM and HT, ** P < 0.001 among three groups