Skip to main content

Table 4 Frequencies of TFPI polymorphisms in two populations according to diabetes mellitus

From: Association study to evaluate TFPI gene in CAD in Han Chinese

SNP

genotype

Population 1

Population 2

diabetes mellitus

Non- diabetes mellitus

diabetes mellitus

Non- diabetes mellitus

CAD n (%)

Non-CAD n(%)

P

CAD n (%)

Non-CAD n (%)

P

CAD n (%)

Non-CAD n (%)

P

CAD n (%)

Non-CAD n (%)

P

Rs8176528

GG

225

104

0.417

583

725

<0.001

125

30

0.726

338

428

0.003

199

76

457

618

65

18

315

366

(88.4)

(73.1)

(78.4)

(85.2)

(52)

(60.0)

(93.2)

(85.5)

AA

9

5

 

31

41

 

9

2

 

9

19

 

(4.0)

(4.8)

(5.3)

(5.7)

(7.2)

(6.7)

(2.7)

(4.4)

GA

17

23

 

95

66

 

51

10

 

14

43

 

(7.6)

(22.1)

(16.3)

(9.1)

(40.8)

(33.3)

(4.1)

(10.1)

Rs10153820

GG

225

104

0.002

583

725

0.063

125

30

0.038

338

428

0.392

103

67

312

353

86

15

199

271

(45.8)

(64.4)

(53.5)

(48.7)

(68.8)

(50.0)

(58.9)

(63.3)

AA

27

13

 

21

43

 

19

4

 

62

75

 

(12.0)

(12.5)

(3.6)

(5.9)

(15.2)

(13.3)

(18.3)

(17.5)

GA

95

24

 

250

329

 

20

11

 

77

82

 

(42.2)

(23.1)

(42.9)

(45.4)

(16.0)

(36.7)

(22.8)

(19.2)

225

104

583

725

125

30

338

428

Rs6434222

TT

107

53

0.803

326

443

<0.001

65

17

0.675

170

268

<0.001

(47.6)

(51.0)

(55.9)

(61.1)

(52.0)

(56.7)

(50.3)

(62.6)

AA

21

8

 

27

91

 

5

2

 

6

58

 

(9.3)

(7.7)

(4.6)

(12.6)

(4.0)

(6.6)

(1.8)

(13.6)

TA

97

43

 

230

191

 

55

11

 

162

102

 

(43.1)

(41.3)

(39.5)

(26.3)

(44.0)

(36.7)

(47.9)

(23.8)

225

104

583

725

125

30

338

428

Rs7586970

TT

161

76

0.926

520

627

0.043

67

13

0.065

317

378

0.027

(71.6)

(73.1)

(89.2)

(86.5)

(53.6)

(43.3)

(93.8)

(88.3)

CC

13

5

 

23

52

 

13

8

 

8

24

 

(5.8)

(4.8)

(3.9)

(7.2)

(10.4)

(26.7)

(2.4)

(5.6)

TC

51

23

 

40

46

 

45

9

 

13

26

 

(22.6)

(22.1)

(6.9)

(6.3)

(36.0)

(30.0)

(3.8)

(6.1)

  1. Calculations were performed with comparison of three different genotypes. Values are the number (percentage) of subjects. After stratification analysis based on diabetes mellitus, significant association was found between genotype distributions and CAD in CAD patients and non-CAD controls