Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Bleeding events associated with a low dose (110 mg) versus a high dose (150 mg) of dabigatran in patients treated for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Cardiovascular DisordersBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:83

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0511-8

Received: 10 January 2017

Accepted: 7 March 2017

Published: 15 March 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jessica Skelley
22 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hiten Patel
24 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Pravesh Bundhun
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
7 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
15 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12872-017-0511-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
(2)
Department of Cardiology, The People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region

Advertisement