This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Bleeding events associated with a low dose (110 mg) versus a high dose (150 mg) of dabigatran in patients treated for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 10 January 2017
Accepted: 7 March 2017
Published: 15 March 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Jan 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jessica Skelley|
|22 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hiten Patel|
|24 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Pravesh Bundhun|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|15 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12872-017-0511-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.