Skip to main content

Table 2 Variable comparison among different lesion groups

From: Correlations of serum cystatin C and glomerular filtration rate with vascular lesions and severity in acute coronary syndrome

Index

Control (n = 39)

S (n = 91)

D (n = 67)

M ( n = 37)

P

Gender

    

0.0153

   F

19 (48.72%)

20 (21.98%)

16 (23.88%)

8 (21.62%)

 

   M

20 (51.28%)

71 (78.02%)

51 (76.12%)

29 (78.38%)

 

Age

63.59 ± 9.14

62.40 ± 10.56

61.67 ± 12.12

66.49 ± 10.70

0.1591

Hypertension

23 (58.97%)

53 (58.24%)

40 (59.70%)

30 (81.08%)

0.0670

LDL-C

2.60 ± 0.77

2.74 ± 1.07

3.10 ± 0.91

2.97 ± 1.03

0.0449

Diabetics

6 (15.38%)

27 (29.67%)

21 (31.34%)

11 (29.73%)

0.2608

LVEF

-

59.16 ± 5.17a

60.60 ± 5.67b

58.05 ± 8.00

0.0644

Killip classification

    

0.1090

   Grade I

-

31 (77.50%)c

32 (86.49%)d

15 (68.18%)e

 

   Grade II

-

8 (20.00%)c

3 (8.11%)d

2 (9.09%)e

 

   Grade III

-

1 (2.50%)c

2 (5.41%)d

4 (18.18%)e

 

   Grade IV

-

0 (0.00%)c

0 (0.00%)d

1 (4.55%)e

 

Cys C

1.30 ± 0.35

1.27 ± 0.30

1.34 ± 0.44

1.51 ± 0.59

0.0296

Scr

75.87 ± 19.73

73.29 ± 14.82

77.87 ± 21.31

80.84 ± 29.00

0.2370

eGFR

81.44 ± 23.95

92.31 ± 31.02

90.05 ± 32.50

83.56 ± 34.39

0.2146

  1. Note:
  2. athe cases with valid LVEF data in group S were 88 cases
  3. bthe cases with valid LVEF data in group D were 62 cases
  4. cthe cases with valid Killip classification data in group S were 40 cases
  5. dthe cases with valid Killip classification data in group D were 37 cases
  6. ethe cases with valid Killip classification data in group M were 22 cases