Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of complications in the studied subjects

From: Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty – A prospective, randomized comparison

Variable

Radial

Femoral

p value

N (%)

N (%)

Hematoma

0

29 (14.5%)

0.005 (Sig)

Bleeding complications

6 (3%)

14 (7%)

0.039 (sig)

TIMI major bleeding

0

8 (4%)

TIMI minor bleeding

6 (3%)

4 (2%)

Required Blood transfusion

0

2 (1%)

Access site complications

0

10 (5%)

0.0003 (sig.)

Access site surgery/intervention

0

1 (2%)

0.63 (NS)

Thrombophlebitis

16 (8%)

35 (17.5%)

0.004 (Sig)

Pseudoaneurysm

0

2 (1%)

1.87 (NS)

Hematoma >5 cm

0

3 (1.5%)

0.002 (sig.)

Coronary perforation

0

1 (0.5%)

2.32 (NS)

Coronary dissection

0

1 (0.5%)

2.31 (NS)

Ecchymosis

25 (12.5%)

41 (20.5%)

0.031 (Sig)

Thrombosis of vessel

1 (0.5%)

0

1.000 (NS)

Access Failure

4 (2%)

0

0.082 (NS)

Sepsis

0

0

1.000 (NS)

Acute Renal injury

0

0

1.000 (NS)

Myocardial infarction

0

0

1.000 (NS)

Stroke

0

0

1.000 (NS)

Procedure failure

8 (4.0%)

0

<0.0001 (Sig)

Infective complications

0

0

1.000 (NS)

Death during hospitalization

0

1 (0.5%)

2.69 (NS)

  1. The commonest post procedure complication was puncture site ecchymosis in 20.5% in transfemoral group compared to only 12.5% in transradial group which is statistically significant. 17.5% developed thrombophelebites in transfemoral group compared to only 8% in transradial group which is statistically significant. Hematoma developed in 14.5% in transfemoral group patients compared to none in transradial group which is statistically significant. Post procedure access site bleeding was seen in 3% patients in transradial group compared to 7% in transfemoral approach which was statistically significant. However there was more access failure rate in transradial group (2%) while as none had it in transfemoral group. Similarly the procedure failure rate was 4% (2% due to access failure 2% due to problem in guide wire hooking) in the transradial group compared to none in transfemoral group and it was statistically significant. One patient (0.5%) developed post procedure thrombosis of the vessel. None of our patients had post procedure Myocardial infarction, Stroke, Acute Renal injury and infections
  2. Abbreviations: N Number, Sig significant, NS not significant